Race vs. Party

Patricia de Lille’s resignation as leader of the DA in the Western Cape sure came as a shock for many. And her reason: to only focus on her role and govern as executive mayor of the Mother City.

In Mother of (only) the City I mention that you never trust everything you being told in politics and that it’s a game of practically anything goes. But now the DA's stronghold province is faced with electing a new leader...

Prior to the announcement end of January rumours have been going around about some trying to get Western Cape Premier and former DA Federal Leader, Helen Zille, to take on De Lille for the provincial leadership at the next congress.

Both De Lille and Zille are known for supporting change and younger leaders. One can thus not be blamed for assuming the two iron ladies reached a truce to allow the young(er) guard to rise.

Front-runners in the provincial race appear to be Acting Provincial Leader, Bonginkosi Madikizela, and DA Cape Metro Chairman, Shaun August.

In a discreet way the two have been campaigning on Facebook.

August’s campaign is highlighting the success of the party in the metro, under his leadership.

Madikizela’s campaign seems to be to get the support of the big guns to endorse him.

Call me crazy but one of the many random thoughts I had was that this is still De Lille vs. Zille – August is one of the former ID leader’s trusted aides and Madikizela once worked in the office of the former Mayor.

Apart from my random thoughts though, from social media it looks like August is leading.

Important maybe to mention the Interim Provincial Leader will be elected by ±120 delegates, of whom fifty percent of the total council comprise members of the Metro-region.

The two politicians are however not the only ones in the race.

Western Cape Standing Committee Chairman for Cultural Affairs and Sport, adv. Lennit Max, is also trying again. The former Western Cape ID leader, without any success, took part in the 2015, 2010 and 2007 race.

Also in the race is the only female, Dr. Arlene Adams, a City of Cape Town councillor. The former academic in a recent interview said: “If you don’t enter a race‚ you lose 100%. For a candidate‚ I have given myself a 25% chance”.

As for being the only female, competing to take over the position previously held by a female, Adams said she taught there would be more women putting themselves forward.

“I am stepping forward as a woman representing‚ embodying those people who do not speak and I am hoping they will understand that’s what the party is about.”

Delegates heading to Worcester will have to ask themselves if they voting for race, to see who crosses first, or for the party.

Just for those coming with majority in the province are coloureds, so a coloured should lead: note that in the North West, Limpopo and Eastern Cape where more than 90% of the population is black, the party leader is coloured (Joe McGluwa) and white (Jacques Smalle and Athol Trollip) respectively.

What is interesting about this election is that the person would possibly only be Interim leader until the provincial elective congress in August 2017 (should he or she not stand again).

The party won’t admit its factions and infighting – like who would – but they there. [And this is not me campaigning] but why not go for a neutral interim leader, who can keep the ship steady until the Provincial Elective Congress.

While the last academic, dr. Wilmot James, ran unsuccessfully for a leadership position, I am tempted to say the unknown dr. Adams could be a safe bet.

To build on the success of the party August, who already proven himself in the Metro-region and is DA Chief Whip in the City council, might not be a bad choice.

One could also argue adv. Max, who is a former provincial police chief, might be what the party needs to address the growing crime rate.

If you want to be traditional though, Madikizela who is also provincial housing minister and elected deputy party leader would be your choice.

Given the campaigning of not only the past three weeks, but months, delegates will have to ask do we vote for the race or the party?

And if the 2016 US Presidential election taught us anything: it’s don’t trust social media, it’s anything goes.

The long walk continues...

Reflecting on #SONA2017 too many people are laughing and describing our parliament as a circus – and that is not because we take the cue from the president, who was laughing…

During the events I had a moment where I had to ask do we still have a democracy and democratic Parliament. 

Like 13 January 2015, the morning after, I lower my head in shame as a South African – this is not the democracy that hundreds of men and woman gave up their lives for us to enjoy.

Facial expressions one got from Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng and former President Thabo Mbeki summed up that the undemocratic events during a Joint Sitting of the two houses of Parliament and should be of grave concern for each and every voter.

Our 490 members of Parliament have privileges on the chamber floor, or so I thought. How many times will we have to view the force removal of democratically elected members? They do represent a percentage of voters – whether it’s 0.8%, 6% or 30%.

 

Julius Malema and his caucus might have valid points, but as pointed out by the Leader of the Official Opposition, Mmusi Maimane, and Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces, Thandi Modise: the joint sitting was not the platform for them. 

Will there ever be a platform? ANC Chief Whip Jackson Mthembu’s point of order sounded like he was heading that way and then he made a u-turn. The former ANC spindoctor left a window open when he mention about “the ability of Parliament to remove the president”.

Given the few failed No Confidence and Impeachment motions I doubt it will happen in Jacob Zuma’s tenure. That makes me wonder do we really have to go through two more SONA’s that has more action than the Action Movie channel.

Whether you like or agree with him or not, Jacob Zuma is President of the Republic – duly elected by the democratically elected 400 members of the National Assembly.

The honourable members might have valid points of order, but until the President – irrespective of the person holding the office – is impeach, citizens have a right to hear (and not view) the State of our Nation.

As citizen and more particularly registered voter my hope and dream now is that our leaders – the Presiding Officers of Parliament will reach a point where they sit with leaders and Chief Whips of all parties represented in the house, along with the Leader of Government Business and the Parliamentary Counsellor to the President and – act in the interest of the country they meant to serve.

There is a dark cloud hanging over our democracy. If I read the last address, our first democratically elected president, the late Nelson Mandela delivered to Parliament [26 March 1999] I cannot wonder if Madiba knew that we would have to cross this bridge.

Tata warned us “the long walk continues. Mooi loop!”

Waar sal my hulp vandaan kom…

Vir sommige is dit nogal iets om te sien wie by die kerk inkom, maar toe maak Somizi die ander dag ’n grand exit uit die kerk. Sy uitstappery is toe boonop oor homofobiese aanmerkings wat ’n gasprediker by ’n diens in Soweto gemaak het.

Intussen is ’n groep kerkleiers ongelukkig oor die nuwe voorgestelde #haatspraakwet. Die godsdiensleiers reken hulle sal nie die boodskap wat God hulle gegee het kan uitdra nie en in besonder, dat om gay te wees verkeerd en sonde is.

Die NGK sê op sy beurt: “Sou die wet toegepas word, kan dit selfs vryheid van spraak en vryheid van godsdiens in gedrang bring”.

In November het prof. Wannie Carstens bande met die kerk gebreek oor die kerk se besluit oor gaylidmate. Hy sê die kerk het hom gedrop. “Wat het geword van die liefdesgebod: Jy moet jou naaste liefhê soos jouself. En ons mag nie voorskryf wie hierdie ‘naaste’ moet wees nie.”

In Brakpan, van alle plekke, weer is daar ’n eetplek wat ’n gaypaartjie verbied het om deel te wees van hul Date Night. Die eienaar sê die rede vir geen gaypaartjies is nie om teen enige persoon te diskrimineer nie, maar om ‘n paartjiesaand te beheer.

Einde verlede jaar het SuidAfrika vir die Amerikaanse pastoor, Steven Anderson, nee gesê om na ons land te kom om gayhaat te preek. Die pastoor het gesê 49 mense wat in ’n gayklub vermoor is, is goeie nuus omdat “die klomp perverts en pedofiele is”.

Daar is egter talle ander godsmanneen vroue hier in die land wat soortgelyke uitlatings maak en die preekstoel misbruik om hul menings as Godswoord te deel.

Onlangs het ek in drie afsonderlike voorvalle gesels met individue wat depressief, ontsteld en hartseer is oor hoe kerkleiers hul posisie misbruik.

Pleks van liefde te preek, word uitlatings gemaak wat die waardigheid van individue aantas.
Ek het op Facebook gevent “geestelike leiers sal nooit die pyn begryp wat hul veroorsaak met die woorde in hul preke nie”.

’n Dominee stuur toe aan my die volgende boodskap: “Ons spreek net wat God op ons hart plaas”. Ek kon nie help om te reageer met: “ek hoop dit is God en nie Lucifer se stem nie”.

In 2016 het ons begin met rassistiese aanmerkings en ons is skaars deur die eerste maand van 2017 en ek wonder of dit die jaar van homofobiese haat gaan wees? Net einde November was dit 10 jaar sedert SuidAfrika die vyfde land in die wêreld en eerste op die vasteland geword het wat selfdegeslaghuwelike gewettig het.

SuidAfrika se Grondwet is duidelik ons almal “het waardigheid en die reg dat dit gerespekteer word”.

Artikel 9 (3) en (4) noem dat niemand direk of indirek onregverdig teenoor enige persoon mag diskrimineer nie.

Die afgelope week was die spertyd vir belangstellendes om insette en kommentaar te lewer op die haatspraakwet. Met dié wet wil die regering sy plig nakom, om gelyke regte te reguleer en diskriminasie te verbied.

Haatspraak word gesien as enige vorm van kommunikasie waar ’n persoon ’n ander persoon of groep dreig, beledig, bespot of skeltaal gebruik.

Laat ons nie doekies omdraai nie, daar is kerkleiers wat preke gebruik om sekere mense te na te kom – of soos ons in die kerkbanke sal sê, pastoor het vandag weer lekker “skim gegooi”.

Uitlatings oor ras, geslag, kultuur of seksuele oriëntasie tas die waardigheid van daardie persoon aan, iets wat veronderstel is om gerespekteer te word. Die einste plek wat ’n veilige hawe moet wees, blyk al hoe meer die plek van oordeel te word.

Ek is een van daardie mense wat in die kerkbanke grootgeword het. Daar het ek geleer dat God is liefde, ons is almal sy kinders en die liefde van Jesus is wonderbaar.

Ek sukkel egter om nou te verstaan waarom ons so selektief is met ons Bybel en sekere verse aanhaal wanneer dit ons pas. Tog vergeet ons van al die ander verse. En dan praat ek nie eens van diegene wat nie eens al 66 Bybelboeke ken nie.

Het God tog nie maar geweet ons sal ook hierdie kruis moet dra, die dat hy sê “roep my aan in die dag van benoudheid”? Steeds kan ek nie help as om te vra “waar sal my hulp vandaan kom?”.

Troos lê daarin dat kerkleiers ook maar mense is, nes ek en jy, gebore in sonde. En ons almal sal eendag alleen voor die Grootman moet gaan rekenskap gee.

My antwoorde vind ek in my wyle ouma se gunstelinggesang:

“My enigste troos in lewe en dood

is dat ek aan Jesus Christus behoort.

Niks sal my ooit van Hom kan skei

– dis my anker, my vaste hoop.”

• Oorspronklike het as Post Scriptum in Paarl Post van Donderdag 2 Februarie 2017 verskyn.