Are we all equal before the cross

Thou shall not judge. Not only a verse but also a saying, you have either heard or said. How ironic though that it is the church and religious leaders who preach God alone can judge, then do exactly what you and I are warned about.

Last week the Anglican Church rejected a proposal to bless couples in same-sex relationships.

The DRC/NGK last month decided to recall a synod decision that was put on hold after appeals were received. This comes after members of the church threatened with a court case, as the church acted outside of their own rules regarding the appeal. It has almost been a month now and still no implementation took place.

This week all eyes will be on the Uniting Reformed Church, who will again consider a report from a task team. The church had three task teams and been doing studies for 12 years. The church composed a comprehensive report, under the leadership of prof. Allan Boesak and this was accepted in 2005 as guideline. The very same Boesak in 2008 resigned from all positions in the church because of the discriminating attitude towards gays and lesbians, from the church that is meant to be a safe haven.

How ironic is it not that the decision by the church comes days after the controversial American pastor Steven Anderson was banned from entering our country and promote his hate speech. Anderson amongst other things said after the Orlando nightclub shooting “it is good, there are 49 lesser gays” and that “gays should all be killed”.

In the week of the Steven Anderson events the church and the voice of the men and women who are meant to spread the love of God, was silent.

Apart from the conservative view the church will always hold, you cannot help to ask yourself why it takes the church – who preach love – to show love. The answer is that the church must act church orderly, within ecumenical rules.

When it comes to the gay topic though, the church contradicts herself on many points.

That is the first mistake the church does, to discriminate by excluding lesbians, bisexuals and transgender-persons.

The church might have legitimate reasons why they dragging the issue. But in the church that preach everyone is equal in the eyes of God, terms like “they” and “us” are used.

How are we then all equal before the cross?

Long gone are the days that Bible verses were used when referring to “them” and those. Those who still make use of Bible verse have probably not recently read the bible.

It is this year [2016] a decade that South Africa became the fifth country in the world and first in the Southern hemisphere to recognise same-sex relationships. This in itself is a huge achievement for the LGBT-community when acting president Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka signed the Civil Union bill into law on 29 November 2006.

While we have the law, there is not a lot of support from the one safe haven in our country – the church.

Many will say sexual orientation is a choice. Unless I bumped my head as a baby I cannot imagine how any person would decide to be exposed to criticism, humiliation, ridicule and discrimination.

A few months ago a reverends was extremely critical towards gays on Facebook. I asked him if he ever made time to talk to a gay person and ask how that person feels and if he would decide to be humiliated every day. I then asked that he first look at home before he criticises others.
What I did not do is out his son.

Before more studies are done, like LGBT-members are some kind of experiment, our religious leaders should learn from this: time has come to drop your title and have a conversation with their brothers and sisters.

• Afrikaans version appeared in Paarl Post of Thursday 6 October 2016

Religious leaders our moral compass

The South African Council of Churches (SACC) and National Religious Leaders Forum (NRLF) last week added their voice to the growing calls for Jacob Zuma to do the honourable thing and resign.

Now what makes this so special?

The religious groups normally speak out on pertinent social issues.

But this is the first time I can recall in our young democracy that the two bodies not only have a joint meeting on a specific issue, but also a joint meeting with the ANC as well as a joint press briefing calling on Jacob Zuma to resign.

Surely this alone calls for a moment of silent reflection, considering past tension between the two and in the foreseeable future we may not see this joint effort again.

A brief history of the two formations is that the NRLF was formed in post-apartheid South Africa, with one of their most prominent leaders being Pastor Ray McCauley of Rhema Bible Church. The SACC needs no introduction, having 

been in alliance with the ANC during the anti-apartheid struggle.

As one would expect the “devil” was not happy. Our church leaders were criticised and their actions questioned. Some colleagues even asked who gave them a mandate – even though they were elected. One of the comments I read was that our religious leaders should not judge but act with love and compassion.

“The pulpit cannot be used by religious leaders for politics, and only the ANC can ask the president to resign,” said the chaplain at the Chris Hani Memorial Service.

Yes, politically he may be correct, and we have already received indications of this.

ANC Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe, at two press briefings he addressed - one after the national officials met and the other after the extended national working committee meeting X made this distinction clear. When 235 members of Parliament voted against the DA impeachment motion to remove the President, the ANC NWC and parliamentary caucus indicated they would never again recall a sitting head of state, as the party’s national executive committee did in September 2008 when it recalled Thabo Mbeki as President.

Not all religious leaders asked the President to step down. On Monday, the National Interfaith Council of South Africa welcomed the President’s apology to South Africa and criticised men and women of God for asking him to resign. It may be worth noting that one of the prominent members of this council is former ANC Parliamentary Chief Whip Dr Mathole Motshekga, who was also a member of the Nkandla Ad hoc committee.

Reading all the unhappy comments, I was wondering if they did not read or didn’t know 1 Timothy 5:20, which says: “But those elders who are sinning you are to reprove before everyone, so that the others may take warning...” There is also Deuteronomy, Acts, Titus, Corinthians and several other scriptural texts one could quote from.

Prof Mary-Ann Plaatjies-van Huffel, World Council of Churches President for Africa and moderator of the Uniting Reformed Church in Southern Africa (and first female to hold this position), wrote to President Jacob Zuma on Wednesday 6 April – in a letter composed on Sunday 3 April with a humble, though serious request.

The letter, a copy of which is in my possession, contains no politics just a humble reminder of moral integrity, asking the President to do the right thing and not let his own struggle in the fight for liberation fade from the memory of the nation.

A friend occasionally tells me that politics and religion do not go together... you will be busy praying and swearing at the same time. Although many religious leaders tried it on the political scene, I agree that the pulpit should not be used for politics – indeed for souls. But we cannot ignore our country’s history and remind ourselves that religious leaders – and we can name people like Oom Beyers Naudé, Dr Allan Boesak, Archbishop-emeritus Desmond Tutu, Rev Frank Chikane, Archbishop-emeritus Bill Burnett and many others – played an instrumental role in #ApartheidHasFallen and the #RiseOfDemocracy

Yes, politics can make one forget one’s values, even if only for a second.

But our religious leaders have a role to play and we should see them as the moral voice in our country, for our [political] leaders.

• This opinion piece was originally published in Paarl Post of Thursday 14 April 2016 [pg.8]