Earl September

My photo
I write what ever comes to mind. Real is me and my views/opinion. Be Yourself, be REAL Open-minded young South African who loves to follow South African politics and social issues. I try not to limit myself as I'm capable of more than where I'm now.
Showing posts with label JP Smith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JP Smith. Show all posts

Monday, 23 August 2021

DA Cape Town no.2 more interesting

The DA announced Geordin Hill-Lewis as it's Mayoral Candidate for the City of Cape Town. An announcement that came as a no surprise.

There are a few important events surrounding the announcement of the mayoral candidate.

The first thing to keep our eyes on is whether the incumbent Dan Plato will complete the current term, or will he move to the national assembly and become a back-bencher or will he move to the provincial legislature.

Should Plato move to the Western Cape Provincial Parliament the second thing to keep our eyes on is if he will become and MEC and who will make space for him in cabinet?

LIFO [Last In, First Out] would probably be the easiest solution, Daylin Mitchell could be dropped as Transport and Public Works MEC and become the answer to the third important thing to keep our eyes on: who will be candidate for Deputy Mayor.

For Hill-Lewis to have governance experience is not that crucial but his lieutenants and especially number two should. It thus looks like an easy, simple move but in politics nothing is easy or simple.

Daylin Mitchell might only be minister for a few months, but he is a former chairperson of the transport and public works, as well as premier and constitutional matters committees. He is also a former deputy chief whip and deputy caucus chairperson.

One can expect the Deputy Mayoral Candidate position to be a bigger competition than the Mayoral one.

Race is a sensitive issue and the DA who believes in non-racialism might give some hope to the current deputy mayor Ian Neilson for another term or Mayco Members JP Smith and James Vos to throw their names in the hat. Neilson, Smith and Vos have the expertise for the position and would give great support to Hill-Lewis as a Mayor. It would however be difficult to convince not only voters and potential voters but also party members that with white Mayor and Deputy Mayor Candidates the DA is not a white party.

From within the DA there would be a push that the number two be a person of colour. Four names come to mind...

Top of the list is Xanthea Limberg, whose name have been previously rumoured as a potential deputy mayor candidate, followed by Zahid Badroodien.

The other two on my list might not have governance experience but they know the communities, are regularly on the ground and to an extend are engaging on the streets. They are Angus McKenzie, the Bonteheuwel-ward councillor, and Reagen Allen, chairperson of the standing committee on community safety and cultural affairs and sport.

Three of the above eight names have previously hinted at aiming for the blue cloak. There could however be wildcard candidates like Patricia van der Ross and Dr. Arlene Adams.

The DA can be very predictable, applying textbook politics, like watching House of Cards and West Wing at once. Thus, when selecting the number two for the City of Cape Town, the DA should be honest and take parties like the EFF, NFP, Good, Icosa, CDR and the Patriotic Alliance serious. 

It should also first decide whether the status quo will do or will they want to stir the pot – like deal with pending disciplinary matters…

Sunday, 21 October 2018

Metrorail: The Rail Disaster


Cape Town mayoral committee member for safety and security, JP Smith summed up the city’s embattled rail infrastructure as: “People talk as if Prasa [Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa] must still collapse. It has already collapsed.”

Once upon a time Metrorail was the backbone of transportation in the Western Cape.
No longer is the rail company the prime mover of most of those who contribute towards the economy in the province.
Commuters are subjected to daily train cancellations and, for those fortunate to get a train, it is almost always delayed.
Multiple factors contribute to the frustrating situation.
Most delays are due to obsolete infrastructure, the result of decades of disinvestment in passenger rail.
To make matters worse, there are daily incidents of vandalism and, since October 2015, there have been frequent train-related fire incidents.
“Commuters no longer depend on Metrorail because the failures of the rail agency are forcing them to make use of their own alternative transport,” said Dan Plato, Cape Town’s Mayor in waiting.

In January, Prasa went as far as to admit the system had derailed and that it was unable to guarantee a safe journey to commuters.
Fast forward 10 months to the beginning of October, and the Rail Safety Regulator (RSR) issued a suspension notice to Prasa which read: “Prasa Rail cannot demonstrate confidence to the RSR that it has the ability, commitment and resources to properly assess and effectively control the risks arising from its railway operation – to the detriment of the safety of those who may be affected by its railway operations.”
Two days later, Prasa dragged the RSR to court in a bid to stop the regulator’s intention to cancel train operations. In a supervisory order, Prasa was told by the Pretoria North Court to “stick to the safety requirements of the RSR or end up being cancelled”.
Judge Cassim Sadiwalla said: “This is a case of national importance. Prasa is responsible for creating a safe rail environment for employees and commuters.”
This reiterates a 2015 Constitutional Court ruling that Prasa had an obligation to protect commuters from any form of incident.
The directive by the RSR relates to the every-increasing number of manual authorizations of trains. This means Prasa’s maintenance management is not improving.
Prasa spokesperson Nana Zenani said: “At least 33% - or 165 488 – of the manual authorization incidents in the country are because of vandalism of signal equipment and cable theft”.
In terms of the court order, Prasa is obliged to give monthly written progress feedback to the RSR and the judge. The rail operator may also not deploy or use new rolling stock without prior approval by the RSR.
Furthermore, a comprehensive integrated asset condition assessment report – for all of Prasa’s railway infrastructure – needs to be handed over to the RSR by March 2019.

Metrorail Western Cape spokesperson Riana Scott was initially not keen to respond to a list of questions regarding train operations, security and customer communication, and their direct effect on commuters, staff and stakeholders.
Zenani referred all questions on the state of Metrorail Western Cape to the regional manager, Richard Walker.
“The operational responsibility in the Western Cape is with Walker and his team. They should account for operational matters.”
After doing so, Scott said: “Re-signalling for the Cape Flats Line and Southern Line between Salt River and Fish Hoek is complete. Central and North have yet to commence.”
When asked about plans to start on the other lines, Scott said she could only respond with the information she had available.
Walker, in August, told members of the media re-signalling for Central Line would start later this year to early 2019 and North between late 2019 and mid-2020.
On the effects of re-signalling, Scott explained: “Experience has shown the inadvertent impact of migration to new technologies has sporadic service system failures as part of commissioning and testing new technology.”
This, together with old infrastructure has largely contributed to major service disruptions.
At this stage there is no due date for completion.

While Metrorail and Prasa have yet to admit as much, frequent commuter experience has shown that until upgrades have been completed, commuters are in for a long tough ride.
Customer communication – the one thing Metrorail can control – does not seem to be a priority. This is also evident from the hundreds of complaints you read on social media.
In August 2017, Walker admitted to members of the Western Cape provincial legislature’s standing committee on transport that “Metrorail is not communicating enough with commuters.”
In February 2018, Prasa group executives told members of the parliamentary portfolio committee on transport “Commuters would be happy with more communication.”
According to Scott: “Customer concerns are assessed, and efforts are made to educate, elaborate on and explain issues.”
Like her boss, Scott concede that many complaints relate to lack of communication.
“Trains have no on-board announcement capability,” she said. “This leaves Metrorail reliant on SMSes, via an external service provider, on social media and on centralised announcements.”
Scott added not all stations have operable announcements systems.
“Stations with operable systems can make local announcements and loudhailers are available to be used at stations by staff.”
She further explains: “As modern systems replace outdated ones the integration of information is often temporarily not possible. Like information on electronic display boards often misaligned to real operating conditions during service interruptions.

Plato, who attempted to catch a train this week from Mitchells Plain to Cape Town station to experience first-hand what train commuters are subjected to, said: “Until problems at top level are not resolved, it is commuters who will continue to suffer because of a lack of action.”
In February, Economic Freedom Fighters MP, Nontando Nolutshungu, told Prasa: “Commuters only want to know how you take them to work or home and what are you doing if trains are cancelled.  There should be a simple plan.”
DA MP, Manny de Freitas, was less diplomatic, saying “Prasa has no clue what is happening on their tracks. This justify the frustration amongst commuters”
Transport portfolio committee chairperson, Dikiledi Magadzi said: “Commuters hanging on trains are torture and Prasa officials are not realistic when talking about modernisation plans.”


Apart from all the vandalism Metrorail Western Cape has since October 2015 lost half their trains sets in train fire incidents. To date train carriages lost in fire incidents in 2018:
  • 4 on 22 Mei at Retreat
  • 2 on 30 Mei at Ottery
  • 3 on 18 Junie at Steenberg
  • 2 on 25 Junie at Philippi
  • 7 on 21 July at Cape Town
  • 5 on 26 July at Retreat
  • 2 on 28 July at Cape Town
  • 2 on 21 August at Koeberg
  • 5 on 28 September at Dal Josaphat
  • 2 on 28 September at Firgrove
  • 1 on 28 September at Cape Town
  • 8 on 9 October at Cape Town


In the Ottery incident Leigh Jansen sustained third degree burnt wounds. A 35-year old female commuter, originally from the Eastern Cape, died in the fire. She was not the only train fire casualty.
In January 2016 navy cadet Gerald Gouws died in a train fire at Glencairn. It took DNA-test two months to confirm the identity of the 23-year old from Uitenhage in the Eastern Cape.
It remains a mystery who is behind the suspected arson attack at Metrorail. All stakeholders agree it is a well-orchestrated plan to destroy rail transportation.

In July while visiting torched carriages transport minister dr. Blade Nzimande said: “Prasa spends thousands on security but there is no value for money.
He declared the rail operator in the province a priority, but since then more carriages went up in flames and no plans implemented.
Magadzi is more frustrated that there is no movement at Prasa and said: “It is a concern that Prasa receives money to improve security, but it is not used for that. There is just no improvement.

Commuters want to know how is it that trains burn, even with a security presence on platforms.
In the province, Metrorail has only 1845 security officials. Of these,789 are employed by Prasa; the rest are contracted security.
These include officials who do special investigations, administrative duties, staff on leave and/or training.
In support of these officers, a joint project by the city, the Western Cape government and Prasa was meant to be launched this week. There was, however, a twist: The deployment of the City’s rail unit was delayed as it was still awaiting permission to operate on Prasa infrastructure.

Cape Town mayoral committee member for transport Brett Herron sum up how commuters feel: “To travel the way thousands of train commuters do daily is unimaginable. The conditions are horrifying… In my opinion unconstitutional!”

This is an unedited version of an article originally published in City Press on Sunday 21 October 2018

Friday, 26 January 2018

Own Goals...

Own goals, that could hurt the DA at the ballot box. Those the words of many senior party members in reaction to the ongoing saga surrounding Patricia de Lille.
In a previous blog, DA Confusion, I said you not alone if you feel confuse about the charges against the Cape Town Mayor. Well now we know the charges [see bullets i to v below] but developments since then would appear as if some are jumping the gun [skip to the conclusion if you cannot wait].

Earlier this week the Western Cape High Court ruled Mayor Patricia De Lille be allowed to attend City caucus meetings when matters of governance are discussed, after parties involved reach an agreement. (see bullet d below)
This ruling comes a day after JP Smith returned to party activities and on the same day party leader, Mmusi Maimane, said he would the next day [Wednesday 24 January 2018] announce a multi-disciplinary programme of action to deal with the management of averting ‘Day Zero’ [water crisis].

Maimane then launched and said he is personally taking responsibility for #DefeatDayZero. The DA leader who said he is taking political control also announced a Drought Crisis Team, that notably excluded the Mayor of the first City in the world to possibly run out of water.
Why mention this, because hours after this launch the DA City Caucus held a special meeting discussing the Mayor’s fate.

On Sunday councillor Mercia Kleinsmith requested an urgent DA caucus meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence in the Mayor.
“There are simply too many worrying matters, actions and press releases that are in contradiction with DA policies and values. All indications are that the party and its structures, the public and this caucus has lost confidence in the mayor to lead this city,” Kleinsmith motivated the motion.
A five-hour marathon meeting concluded with 152 of the caucus members voting: with 8 abstaining, 1 spoilt ballot and 84 votes in support and 59 against it.
The City of Cape Town Council has 231 seats. A majority of 116 votes is needed for the motion to pass.

The caucus decision now goes to the Federal Executive for consideration but the green light might not be given before the next council meeting on Wednesday 31 January 2018 – where an ANC sponsored Motion of No Confidence, that was handed in last month, will be tabled.
De Lille reportedly says she is not worried about the decision.
“The party has to decide on that. It is not council, it was the DA’s caucus meeting. I am still the mayor of Cape Town and I can only be removed by the full City of Cape Town. It does not say anything.”

While councillors are constitutionally allowed to table such a motion it is important to note DA candidates for Mayors; deputies and speakers are selected by a selection panel pending the approval of the FedEx, before the relevant caucus formally nominate and vote for such candidates.

Perhaps good to remind ourselves that in especially the last two elections DA leaders travelled across the country selling the good governance and corruption free City of Cape Town. “Where we govern, we govern well,” is what we were told. Ironically the person leading the well-run City is now accused of serious allegations by the very same council she is leading.
Patricia de Lille is also charged by her party for alleged misconduct for
  1. Acting in a way that impacts negatively on the image or performance of the party
  2. Failed to carry out duties and responsibilities set out by the standards required by the statutory rules required by the public office.
  3. Bringing the name of the party in disrepute
  4. Acted in an unreasonable and detrimental manner
  5. Unreasonably failed to comply with or rejected decisions of the official formations of the party.
To take another step back, late in 2017:
(a) A public war of words broke out between the Mayor and a member of her mayoral committee, JP Smith. At the centre of the spat is the disbanding of the City’s special investigation unit – that resorted under Smith.(b) Smith also wrote a letter to party leaders, that leaked to the media, mentioning speculation of unauthorized security alterations at Patricia De Lille’s home.(c) An official, Craig Kesson, implicated the mayor in serious allegations concerning two senior staff members. Read Affidavit(d) Patricia De Lille and JP Smith were both placed on special leave from all party activities – this included from attending caucus meetings. Read Statement(e) Prior to a DA federal executive meeting where Patricia De Lille’s submissions on why she should not be fired, Federal Council Chairperson James Selfe told City Press “it is not whether the mayor has done anything right or wrong. The issue to decide on is whether the DA has confidence in her and her ability to run the city and to manage the caucus”.“If a decision is made that De Lille should resign and she refuse, we will have to instruct the DA City caucus to support a motion of no confidence,” Selfe added.

 
It could be all a coincidence that the #DefeatDayZero launch, De Lille’s exclusion from it and her caucus voting to support a motion against the mayor all happened on the same day.
What does boggle the mind – considering everything above – is that the DA caucus might have jumped the gun and with their vote declared Patricia de Lille guilty (of the allegations against her) and decided on her punishment, before there has even been a judgment, let alone a hearing.