Earl September

My photo
I write what ever comes to mind. Real is me and my views/opinion. Be Yourself, be REAL Open-minded young South African who loves to follow South African politics and social issues. I try not to limit myself as I'm capable of more than where I'm now.
Showing posts with label Mmusi Maimane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mmusi Maimane. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 September 2018

#TeamMmusi where is #TeamSouthAfrica



South Africa’s official opposition launched their #Election2019 campaign and with that what they’ve baptised #TeamMmusi [probably pun intended].

In the lead up to the Western Cape governing party announcing it's Premier Candidate, one of their local public representatives told me “I don’t think the DA is ready for the election”.
I responded: the DA is ready; the DA’s message is wrong.
The announcement of #TeamMmusi (I’m enjoying this hashtag) is confirmation of this.
The DA is either ignorant not to know or deliberately ignore two things:
(i) The majority of their core support constituency – in especially the Western Cape – are woman and,
(ii) the average voter really don’t care about the country being in a recession – because to them it won’t immediately change their life.

What the DA is ignoring is that many care about their municipality not delivering a service but have huge municipal rates, long queues at home affairs, dysfunctional public transport service, educators being threatened at schools, kids not safe walking to school, no aftercare program for children, no sport development in schools, arts and culture being the stepchild of the country, excuses being made about high crime level… the list is literally endless!
All issues the DA don’t address. One needs to admit that these issues are raised by the party but then blame is shifted to the ANC, with no immediate solutions put on the table.

One could debate the DA conceded defeat when Mmusi Maimane considered to consider whether to consider to be the Premier Candidate to sit in Wale Street. By now we know the ghost of Leeuwenhof won.

While one could have expected eight of the 11 to be part of the team, six are in positions one expected them to be in.
Perhaps let me just state I am not questioning the competence of #TeamMmusi – they all are competent. We however not told why they were selected to drive the respective issue.

There are a few interesting observations from #TeamMmusi, two of those include:
+ Jacques Julius to drive Secure Borders. One would have expected it to be Stevens Mokgalapa (international relations spokesperson and president of the Africa Liberal Network).
Other choices include Santosh Kalyan, Haniff Hoosen or even Ghaleb Cachalia.

+ John Steenhuisen to drive the crime issue, when the DA’s not only most vocal but knowledgeable person on crime over the past decade is Dianne Kohler Barnard – I’m sure she can name all 1138 police stations in her sleep. Steenhuisen the voice on crime is giving the critics ammunition to shoot this as bringing back the police nickname “boere”.

The irony, sorry slogan of #TeamMmusi is #OneSouthAfrica.
What boggles the mind though is apart from students, education is not a stand-alone issue and public transport and infrastructure don’t feature.
This is sad!
Not only is the biggest portion of the national budget directed to education, we have had serious incidents of school violence and other incidents.
Youth and Students are made issues but that does not mean education as a sector will be addressed. The DA will have to explain how it intends to address youth, students and access to jobs but fail or rather skip the most crucial part – foundation phase.
Like Youth and Students, State Capture and Corruption are made two separate issues. In my opinion both could have been combined as state capture is corruption and students are youth but also covered under education.

#TeamMmusi is what the DA leader and his strategist reckon Mzansi need.
What is a mystery though is where is #TeamSouthAfrica?

Sunday, 4 February 2018

A caucus divided

Patricia De Lille is not the first person the DA asks to take off the Mayoral Chain. Once upon a time Peter Marais was axed as UniCity Mayor. This move was defended in the papers with a half-page advertisement and the case went to court. Minutes before a council meeting the court ruled the DA broke the law in axing Marais and saw the Mayor sliding into the council chamber.
Back then the DA said it wanted Cape Town to be a shining example to the rest of South Africa, but that under Marais’ leadership it had been dogged by crisis, controversy and scandal.

Fast-forward to the present and we are watching the sequel, this time Patricia de Lille is the Mayor. For some reason this make me think about Ghostbusters with Dan and Billy, and the sequel with Melissa.
One of the differences between the two though is that whether Patricia takes off the mayoral chain or not, the DA has a divided City of Cape Town caucus.
Although caucus meetings are closed, council meetings are open to the public and from the gallery you can clearly see the cracks in the caucus.

At the time of writing this the DA requested an Special City Council meeting for a Motion of No Confidence in the Mayor and the party laid criminal charges against Patricia de Lille. The criminal charges come after a businessman handed an affidavit to the party, making allegations of corruption and bribery against De Lille. This relates to allege attempts by De Lille to solicit a R5 million bribe.
The MONC, to be debated on 15 February, will be the second. A previous motion by the ANC was withdrawn at the eleventh hour. That happened as the DA caucus got the green light from their federal leadership to support it.

The decision by the Fedex comes after a caucus meeting with a majority vote recommended to the party higher structure that the caucus support a motion in the mayor.
This after councillor Mercia Kleinsmith requested an urgent caucus meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence in the Mayor.
The motion was motivated “all indications are that the party and its structures, the public and this caucus has lost confidence in the mayor to lead this city”.
The meeting with 152 members of caucus present concluded with 8 abstaining, 1 spoilt ballot and 59 votes against and 84 votes in support of a motion.

Taking another step back, days before Christmas the DA announced a subcommittee “found sufficient management and governance-related challenges in the DA’s City of Cape Town caucus”. As 2018 started DA leader Mmusi Maimane announced the party is formally charging Patricia de Lille, with the party’s Federal Legal Commission. This comes despite the party selling its good story the past decade. She is also accused of alleged misconduct for
  1. Acting in a way that impacts negatively on the image or performance of the party
  2. Failed to carry out duties and responsibilities set out by the standards required by the statutory rules required by the public office.
  3. Bringing the name of the party in disrepute
  4. Acted in an unreasonable and detrimental manner
  5. Unreasonably failed to comply with or rejected decisions of the official formations of the party.
Prior to all this De Lille resigned as DA Western Cape Leader in January 2017. At the time she said it is to focus on only being mayor. Back then I wrote in politics it is anything goes. I also mentioned as Mayor of the Mother City she might lead the biggest DA caucus, but she’s not the first to be a government and party leader.
The resignation came days have she announced a newly revamped Executive Mayoral Committee, with four mini-mayors and a deputy now without a portfolio.

Whether Patricia de Lille is acquitted on the charges or not, both internally and the criminal charges, service delivery in the Mother City is in the hands of a divided governing party. From the 152-member caucus 84 councillors will be happy not to see the first citizen return, or disgruntled that she is returning.
While the party is not addressing the division, one need to ask if the Mayor takes off the chain will there be a push to remove the 59 who supported her. The same question can also be asked if she gets to keep the mayoral chain, if there would be a push to demote or remove the 84 councillors.
We should also not forget the 9 councillors who did not vote and 2 who were absent (on leave). Will they make their alliance known or continue to play neutral?
What if from the 84 or 59 councillors had a change of mind?

The DA’s Federal Congress is taking place later this year, in little over a year we will have a general election and campaigning will kick-start in a few weeks. The DA is determined to win enough votes to be the national government. Before all this the party would want to consider working on unity to say #BetterTogether.

Considering political parties are dependent on votes, it does not take a lot to know the Patricia-saga will cost the DA votes. Insiders say the party’s own polls even suggest this.
Let’s also not forget there is the possibility of a court challenge by DA MPL Lennit Max, after losing the provincial leadership and now citing vote rigging. The courts could order a re-run of the provincial congress.


The party leader took political control over the biggest crisis a DA government has faced. Someone should perhaps advise Mmusi Maimane to allow the experts to ensure we have water. He should perhaps, before all the votes dry up, want to focus on the tension and division within not only the City of Cape Town, but caucuses where the party governs.

You might also be interested in: Own Goals & DA confusion

Friday, 26 January 2018

Own Goals...

Own goals, that could hurt the DA at the ballot box. Those the words of many senior party members in reaction to the ongoing saga surrounding Patricia de Lille.
In a previous blog, DA Confusion, I said you not alone if you feel confuse about the charges against the Cape Town Mayor. Well now we know the charges [see bullets i to v below] but developments since then would appear as if some are jumping the gun [skip to the conclusion if you cannot wait].

Earlier this week the Western Cape High Court ruled Mayor Patricia De Lille be allowed to attend City caucus meetings when matters of governance are discussed, after parties involved reach an agreement. (see bullet d below)
This ruling comes a day after JP Smith returned to party activities and on the same day party leader, Mmusi Maimane, said he would the next day [Wednesday 24 January 2018] announce a multi-disciplinary programme of action to deal with the management of averting ‘Day Zero’ [water crisis].

Maimane then launched and said he is personally taking responsibility for #DefeatDayZero. The DA leader who said he is taking political control also announced a Drought Crisis Team, that notably excluded the Mayor of the first City in the world to possibly run out of water.
Why mention this, because hours after this launch the DA City Caucus held a special meeting discussing the Mayor’s fate.

On Sunday councillor Mercia Kleinsmith requested an urgent DA caucus meeting to discuss a motion of no confidence in the Mayor.
“There are simply too many worrying matters, actions and press releases that are in contradiction with DA policies and values. All indications are that the party and its structures, the public and this caucus has lost confidence in the mayor to lead this city,” Kleinsmith motivated the motion.
A five-hour marathon meeting concluded with 152 of the caucus members voting: with 8 abstaining, 1 spoilt ballot and 84 votes in support and 59 against it.
The City of Cape Town Council has 231 seats. A majority of 116 votes is needed for the motion to pass.

The caucus decision now goes to the Federal Executive for consideration but the green light might not be given before the next council meeting on Wednesday 31 January 2018 – where an ANC sponsored Motion of No Confidence, that was handed in last month, will be tabled.
De Lille reportedly says she is not worried about the decision.
“The party has to decide on that. It is not council, it was the DA’s caucus meeting. I am still the mayor of Cape Town and I can only be removed by the full City of Cape Town. It does not say anything.”

While councillors are constitutionally allowed to table such a motion it is important to note DA candidates for Mayors; deputies and speakers are selected by a selection panel pending the approval of the FedEx, before the relevant caucus formally nominate and vote for such candidates.

Perhaps good to remind ourselves that in especially the last two elections DA leaders travelled across the country selling the good governance and corruption free City of Cape Town. “Where we govern, we govern well,” is what we were told. Ironically the person leading the well-run City is now accused of serious allegations by the very same council she is leading.
Patricia de Lille is also charged by her party for alleged misconduct for
  1. Acting in a way that impacts negatively on the image or performance of the party
  2. Failed to carry out duties and responsibilities set out by the standards required by the statutory rules required by the public office.
  3. Bringing the name of the party in disrepute
  4. Acted in an unreasonable and detrimental manner
  5. Unreasonably failed to comply with or rejected decisions of the official formations of the party.
To take another step back, late in 2017:
(a) A public war of words broke out between the Mayor and a member of her mayoral committee, JP Smith. At the centre of the spat is the disbanding of the City’s special investigation unit – that resorted under Smith.(b) Smith also wrote a letter to party leaders, that leaked to the media, mentioning speculation of unauthorized security alterations at Patricia De Lille’s home.(c) An official, Craig Kesson, implicated the mayor in serious allegations concerning two senior staff members. Read Affidavit(d) Patricia De Lille and JP Smith were both placed on special leave from all party activities – this included from attending caucus meetings. Read Statement(e) Prior to a DA federal executive meeting where Patricia De Lille’s submissions on why she should not be fired, Federal Council Chairperson James Selfe told City Press “it is not whether the mayor has done anything right or wrong. The issue to decide on is whether the DA has confidence in her and her ability to run the city and to manage the caucus”.“If a decision is made that De Lille should resign and she refuse, we will have to instruct the DA City caucus to support a motion of no confidence,” Selfe added.

 
It could be all a coincidence that the #DefeatDayZero launch, De Lille’s exclusion from it and her caucus voting to support a motion against the mayor all happened on the same day.
What does boggle the mind – considering everything above – is that the DA caucus might have jumped the gun and with their vote declared Patricia de Lille guilty (of the allegations against her) and decided on her punishment, before there has even been a judgment, let alone a hearing.

Sunday, 7 January 2018

DA confusion

If the charges against Cape Town Mayor Patricia de Lille is confusing, don't stress. Even senior DA leaders don’t know what is going on, or not going on.
The Democratic Alliance is possibly also scoring own goals with this matter and it could deal the party a raw hand at the polls come #Election2019.

Questions that need answers include:
- Why the silence from senior party members?
If there is proof of corruption why has Mmusi Maimane not visited a police station, to allow the authorities to investigate the allegations?Why is there a lack of transparency? If there are discrepancies in the report, which was highlighted, why present a flawed report?The tender irregularities are regarding the buses. Why is the mayoral committee member for transport not mentioned? Surely if you the political head of a department you meet with your ED and ask questions, if you pick up things are not what they should be?Bowman Gilfillan concluded that Patricia De Lille is guilty of forwarding City of Cape Town reports to the DA Leader. Mmusi Maimane himself have said this is not true. This makes one wonder can we believe the rest of the content in the BG-report?The DA has been preaching separation of power between party and state. Yet these events involve the party in state processes [one clear example is a statement on 14 December 2017 that reads: The DA prides itself on excellent governance standards, guided by the values of accountability and transparency. For this reason, the Leader directed the caucus of the COCT to establish an independent investigation to probe these allegations.]The DA boast and used the City of Cape Town in their election campaigns as the benchmark for good governance, that is corruption free. Why is the person leading that group being accused of serious allegations, why is there now management and governance-related challenges?
Read extract of special City of Cape Town Council meeting resolutions of Friday 5th January 2018 here.


Perhaps to try and put the above questions in context: towards the end of 2017 three things happened:
(1) A public war of words took place between the Mayor and her Mayoral Committee member for safety and security, JP Smith. At the centre of the spat is the disbanding of the City’s special investigation unit – that resorted under Smith.(2) From the above spat; news broke of security upgrades at the Mayor’s private residence, when Smith in a letter to party leaders Mmusi Maimane and James Selfe pointed to speculation that security alterations at De Lille’s home were made illegally.(3) Craig Kesson, executive director (ED) in the Directorate of the Mayor, implicated the mayor in serious allegations concerning two senior staff members. See Affidavit


De Lille says she has proof she paid for the upgrades from her own pocket, while Speaker Dirk Smit is on the record for saying security upgrades were all done within the legal framework.
In October the DA announced De Lille and Smith, who is also the DA City of Cape Town Caucus Leader and Deputy, were put on special leave from all political party activities. It was also announced a subcommittee will investigate the political management and governance situation in the City of Cape Town. Read statement
Following an affidavit from Kesson two separate issues transpired:
(i) The City of Cape Town Council decided to launch an independent investigation into the serious allegations against senior staff members, and(ii) The DA welcomed above investigation and express their confidence in it.


In November the DA issued another statement saying, “it is important to note that the allegations involve serious questions of good governance and maladministration”. It called members to order by saying “we call on all those who have the City and the DA’s best interests at heart to focus on supporting and co-operating with the”. But stop short of mentioning any names. Read Statement

Ten days before Christmas the party issued another statement saying the subcommittee completed its work and “found sufficient management and governance-related challenges in the DA’s City of Cape Town caucus, negatively impacting the City’s mandate to govern efficiently”.
It also suspended De Lille, pending the outcome of the independent investigation and asked De Lille to submit reasons why she should not resign as Mayor.

What remains a mystery is as what was De Lille suspended, as she was already on special leave from party activities and the party cannot suspend her as Mayor.
Section 58 and 59, read together with section 26, 27 and 28 stipulated when a Mayor and councillor vacate office.

Chairperson of the DA Federal Council James Selfe confirmed to City Press the mayor made her submissions and that this would be considered at a federal executive meeting.
A decision will be made, despite ongoing investigations by the city, he added.
“Our inclination is not whether the mayor has done any right or wrong. The issue that the federal executive have to decide is whether the DA has confidence in her and her ability to run the city and to manage the caucus.”
Selfe added if a decision is made that De Lille should resign, she will be informed accordingly. "If she refuses to do so, we will have to instruct the DA City of Cape Town caucus to support a motion of no confidence in her.”

The City of Cape Town is not the only headache the leadership sit with, numerous other caucuses have their challenges.
In October the DA removed their deputy mayor in Knysna, Peter Myers, in a vote of no confidence – this because he spoke out against incidents of maladministration.
In December four George mayoral committee members [Mercia Draghoender, Belrina Cornelius, Gert Niehaus and Johan Stander] were removed and the Speaker Iona Kritzinger and Chief Whip Michael Nyakati are to move to the mayco in a drastic reshuffle.
Then there’s the courtchallenge by DA MPL Lennit Max, after losing the provincial leadership, citing vote rigging. There is the possibility of the courts ordering a re-run of the provincial congress.


The DA’s Federal Congress is also set to take place in April/May and it is expected Mmusi Maimane will stand for a re-election. Leaders and their demographics elected at this congress will be important for the DA, as the party prepares to go to the Union Buildings in 2019 (but the congress and whether the DA will get the keys to the Union Buildings is an opinion for another day).

Sunday, 5 November 2017

2019: status quo vs. change to unite

 On Monday 6 November 2017 the governing party in the second largest municipality – and thus biggest constituency – in the province elects a new leadership.
This internal election is the first since the 2016 local government election. Following that election the party not only became the first political party to win a consecutive local government election in Drakenstein, but also increased their vote with nearly 10%.  
In 2016 the DA increased their support in the Paarl East – coloured – area, especially Chicago, Amstelhof, Nederburg, Denneburg. The DA also took two ANC stronghold wards, Gouda and Simondium with 60 and 62% respectively. It however did not show any major increase in so-called “white-areas”. In Wellington the DA’s support took a dip in most of the wards.

Above statistics are important if one considers the candidates contesting the internal election. Both candidates for chairperson are from the Paarl-East area, while those standing for deputy are from Wellington and Northern-Paarl. Two of the candidates vying for secretary are from Mbekweni and the other from Paarl-East. The treasurer position is the only uncontested position and incumbent, Gert Combrink – who also happens to be the DA West Region Treasurer – will return for another term.

There appears to only be one slate, with all other candidates campaigning as individuals. Considering the 2016 outcome and party’s targets for 2019, the expectation is that the party would focus at having a more diverse team on local level, representing all the areas of the Constituency. For some time now the DA’s been trying to make inroads in Mbekweni. Having two of three candidates for a position from the area will most likely split the votes from Mbekweni. Two of the three standing for secretary are former activist and first time councillors and the third a former ANC Councillor, with more political experience than her competitors. My expectation from any secretary is also to atleast be able to spell or use spell-checker. From her campaign post though it would appear as if this is a weakness of one of the candidates – she even managed to get the names and titles wrong of those on her slate.

The competition for deputy chairperson is between a “veteran” and an activist. What delegates might want to consider is where the two candidates campaigned during the 2016 local elections, the DA’s support dropped in the area the one campaigned and increased in the area the other one campaigned. Both seem committed to the cause; just one is on a slate and the other not. And that will either turnout to be good or bad.

Perhaps important to remind oneself the DA believes in freedom, fairness and opportunity. It also preaches separation of party and state. Some examples are during Helen Zille’s term as party leader in Parliament Sandra Botha, Athol Trollip, Lindiwe Mazibuko and Mmusi Maimane occupied the role of Parliamentary Leader (Leader of the Official Opposition).
In the Western Cape with Helen Zille leading the provincial government, Theuns Botha, Ivan Meyer, Patricia de Lille and Bonginkosi Madikizela was party leader.
In the City of Cape Town Helen Zille, Dan Plato and Patricia de Lille led the local government, while Grant Pascoe, Shaun August and now Grant Twigg led the party in the metro.

The race for Chairperson is always interesting, and it becomes even more interesting when one of the candidates is a woman. 
Note despite Helen Zille’s successful tenure as party leader, the DA has not exactly broken the glass ceiling for woman leaders in the party. 
Delegates will have to vote between incumbent Chairperson, Conrad Poole, and outgoing Secretary, Wendy Philander.

I have the privilege to have gotten to known both candidates – both caring individuals, who want to make the world better. Both I gotten to know before they became councillors, ironically ward councillors. I saw the election of Conrad during a by-election and Wendy in 2011. During their term as ward councillors both worked hard and people of their wards still hold them in high regard – because both continue to work hard for the people they serve.

Both candidates have used each opportunity that crossed their path.
Wendy, current DA Women’s Network Chairperson, was also part of a Swedish exchange program for woman in local government – something I still think Drakenstein should, but they not, use to their advantage. She served one term on the executive mayoral committee, in the key portfolio of housing.
Conrad was recently elected as DA West Region Deputy Chairman and on the provincial executive as additional member. He’s in his third term as councillor and current executive mayor.

Conrad’s campaign is based on the success of the party under his leadership. The party grew from receiving 32% of the vote in 2006 to 66% in 2016, not without teething problems.
Wendy’s campaign is based on the party’s mission of Freedom, Fairness & Opportunity, creating a platform to develop the next generation, making progress together.

Doing research for this blog it became evident that the party is very much divided. This week DA founder Helen Suzman would have celebrated her centenary. Will Drakenstein’s gift to her be that the status quo is enough to carry the party to 2019 or will the party heading towards 2019, change; unite and develop to increase its support?

Friday, 10 February 2017

The long walk continues...

Reflecting on #SONA2017 too many people are laughing and describing our parliament as a circus – and that is not because we take the cue from the president, who was laughing…

During the events I had a moment where I had to ask do we still have a democracy and democratic Parliament. 
Like 13 January 2015, the morning after, I lower my head in shame as a South African – this is not the democracy that hundreds of men and woman gave up their lives for us to enjoy.


Facial expressions one got from Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng and former President Thabo Mbeki summed up that the undemocratic events during a Joint Sitting of the two houses of Parliament and should be of grave concern for each and every voter.
Our 490 members of Parliament have privileges on the chamber floor, or so I thought. How many times will we have to view the force removal of democratically elected members? They do represent a percentage of voters – whether it’s 0.8%, 6% or 30%.
 
Julius Malema and his caucus might have valid points, but as pointed out by the Leader of the Official Opposition, Mmusi Maimane, and Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces, Thandi Modise: the joint sitting was not the platform for them. 
Will there ever be a platform? ANC Chief Whip Jackson Mthembu’s point of order sounded like he was heading that way and then he made a u-turn. The former ANC spindoctor left a window open when he mention about “the ability of Parliament to remove the president”.
Given the few failed No Confidence and Impeachment motions I doubt it will happen in Jacob Zuma’s tenure. That makes me wonder do we really have to go through two more SONA’s that has more action than the Action Movie channel.

Whether you like or agree with him or not, Jacob Zuma is President of the Republic – duly elected by the democratically elected 400 members of the National Assembly.
The honourable members might have valid points of order, but until the President – irrespective of the person holding the office – is impeach, citizens have a right to hear (and not view) the State of our Nation.

As citizen and more particularly registered voter my hope and dream now is that our leaders – the Presiding Officers of Parliament will reach a point where they sit with leaders and Chief Whips of all parties represented in the house, along with the Leader of Government Business and the Parliamentary Counsellor to the President and – act in the interest of the country they meant to serve.

There is a dark cloud hanging over our democracy. If I read the last address, our first democratically elected president, the late Nelson Mandela delivered to Parliament [26 March 1999] I cannot wonder if Madiba knew that we would have to cross this bridge.

Tata warned us “the long walk continues. Mooi loop!”

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Mother of (only) the City

In politics you never trust everything you being told. It’s a game of practically anything goes.
No matter how true it might be, Patricia De Lille’s reasons for resigning as Leader of the Democratic Alliance in the Western Cape had a number of things running through my mind.

As Mayor of the Mother City she might lead the biggest DA caucus, but she’s not the first to be a government and party leader. See below for other DA leaders in Government
This iron lady has also never shy away from a challenge and not even personal matters can prevent her from giving her best. De Lille also has strong and competent teams supporting her as executive mayor and provincial leader. With the newly revamped Mayco, with four mini-mayors and deputy executive mayor now without a portfolio one would assume it would lift the burden on the City’s number one.


De Lille, known by many for her integrity, cited making our cities, under a DA-government, great again – might be true. But one cannot ignore a few things, most notably her unofficial campaign heading to Leeuwenhof.

The former leader of the Independent Democrats has been tipped at becoming Premier if the DA retains its majority in the Western Cape in 2019. Former DA leader, Premier Helen Zille, is also rumoured to challenge De Lille for the provincial leadership later in November.

This resignation thus paves the way for the provincial Deputy Leader, Bonginkosi Madikizela, to be interim provincial leader. This could be part of De Lille and possibly the DA’s campaign to attract votes heading towards 2019. It could also be part of De Lille’s counter or an agreement to a possible Zille challenge for the November provincial congress.
Both Zille and De Lille are known for supporting change and new leaders emerging and Madikizela is one of the rising stars.

There however rumours doing the rounds that De Lille appeared before a disciplinary hearing. DA officials are mum on this but one can’t help but wonder, what if?
The rumour can make sense for the following:
National DA leadership rapping provincial leadership over the knuckles – for losing or decline support in certain municipalities – and De Lille as leader takes the blame.
Could also be that De Lille took the fall for the Kannaland caucus entering into a coalition with the ANC or the appointment of poo-protester, Loyiso Nkhola, as ESO (executive support officer) in the City of Cape Town.

I really find it difficult to believe that the first female to lead a political party cannot multitask between being both a party and government leader. De Lille was PAC Chief Whip and Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Transport (during the first democratic Parliament), leader of the Independent Democrats and Western Cape Social Development minister and served one term as Mayor and being DA provincial leader. Reasons thus given just don’t add up, considering there are others who juggle or juggled between party and government duties.

Helen Zille was Executive Mayor and DA Federal Leader. Dr. Ivan Meyer is Western Cape Finance Minister and DA Deputy Federal Chairperson, Bonginkosi Madikizela is provincial deputy leader and Western Cape Housing Minister. While provincial Social Development minister, adv. Albert Fritz and Eden Executive Mayor, Memory Booysen are both deputy provincial chairpersons and Tijmen van Essen (Swartland Executive Mayor) and Dan Plato (WC Community Safety minister) both additional members on the provincial leadership.


Whichever option you choose, Patricia de Lille now only mother to the City is good for the nearly 4 million residents in Cape Town, but possibly not for the DA and more than 2 million others in the rest of the Western Cape.

Tuesday, 2 August 2016

It's all about the X

On 3 August more than 26 million of my fellow 54 million South African’s can like me go and make their X. 
We will get the opportunity to choose a political party and ward candidate to represent our needs and deliver on their promises.
Once I have made that cross I will have to live with our collective decision on who will represent my ward and govern my municipal area. 
It is thus important that when I make my X I do so with prise and use my vote wisely.
Just fewer than 50,000 of the more than 3 million Western Cape voters are between 18 and 19 and will make their X for the first time. They/we will get to pick from a record 200 parties and 61 014 candidates contesting the 2016 Municipal Elections; this is approximately 65% more parties and 12% more candidates than in 2011.
Some experts have called this the most important election since that all important 1994 one. All elections are important though, but what would make this one interesting is to see if we as voters will vote according to our needs or based on our loyalty.

Our vote is more than an opportunity it is a responsibility that gives us access to the right to hold our public representatives accountable. Our vote is not just worth five minutes, but indeed five years. Five years to hold those whom we elect accountable to serve the basic needs of the community.
The past few months we have seen various service delivery protests across the country. Just like no person is perfect, so is no party and each hold their own battles Racism, quotas in sport, corruption, a private jet, spy tapes and many other issues are important. What we sometimes forget is to put realistic solutions on the table on issues affecting the everyday lives of especially the poor.
While we worry about a new presidential jet or a racist post on social media, there is a grandma taking care of her 5 grandchildren wondering where will she get tomorrow’s supper. While discuss quotas in sport, the parents of a talented young sport player don’t have the funds to provide him with clothes to practice in.
Yes this election is like all previous and those to come important. 

This election is an opportunity the voter can vote for their needs and who will make a real change in their lives. This local government election is an opportunity for the voter to vote based on your needs, to vote for who can make a change in your life and not just on paper or a poster.
When I walk into the VD and hold my ballot paper, standing alone, I will hold my breath and think that no matter how imperfect our democratic process might or might not be it is still a privilege to vote. A privilege my great-grandparents never had the opportunity to enjoy.
Yes Zuma, Maimane, Malema, Lekota, Prince Buthulezi, Zanele, Godi and the Mulders will come to mind, as will local leaders. But I will also think of Madiba, Oliver, Walter, Albertina, Helen, Frederick, Dullah, Kader, Ashley and the many others who had to pay a prize for me to enjoy this responsibility.
I will take a moment and think of the many challenges in my community and who can address it best.
I will think of human rights, freedom of expression, speech, the press and association. I will think of the rights of minorities, celebrating ethnic diversity and a dream of social cohesion. I will think of poverty, social challenges like drug abuse, teenage pregnancy, HIV, youth unemployment and even the stigma against my LGBTI (gay) friends.
I will also think of peace and hope that you too will use your vote wisely.
Enjoy the responsibility to vote. Vote with pride and walk out of the polling station knowing that you did the right thing.

It is all about the cross!

Original Opinion Piece appeared in Paarl Post of Thursday 28 July 2016

Wednesday, 27 July 2016

Jou kruisie is belangrik

Op 3 Augustus sal meer as 26 miljoen van my medelandsburgers die geleentheid kry om hul kruisie te maak. 
Ons sal die geleentheid kry om ’n politieke party en wykskandidaat te kies om ons te verteenwoordig en hul beloftes na te kom.
Wanneer my keuse gemaak is, sal ek met die kollektiewe besluit – wie my wyk en munisipale gebied gaan regeer – moet aanvaar.

Dit is daarom belangrik dat wanneer ek my kruisie maak, ek dit met trots doen en my stem slim gebruik.
Net minder as 50 000 van die meer as 3 miljoen kiesers in die Wes-Kaap is tussen 18 en 19 en sal vir die eerste keer hul kruisie maak. Hulle sal kan kies uit ’n rekord 200 politieke partye en 61 014 kandidate wat in die munisipale verkiesing meeding. Dit is sowat 65% meer politieke partye en 12% meer kandidate as vyf jaar gelede in 2011.
Talle kenners noem dit die belangrikste verkiesing sedert daai allerbelangrike 1994 een. Tog is alle verkiesings belangrik en wat vanjaar se plaaslike verkiesing interessant maak is om te sien of kiesers volgens hul behoeftes of volgens lojaliteit sal stem. Dit natuurlik as jy dink aan wat die afgelope twee tot vyf jaar gebeur het.


Ons stem is egter meer as ’n geleentheid, dit is ’n verantwoordelikheid wat ons toegang gee tot die reg om ons openbare verteenwoordigers verantwoordbaar te hou. Ons stem is nie net vyf minute werd nie, maar inderdaad vyf jaar. Vyf jaar om diegene vir wie ons kies verantwoordelik te hou om in die gemeenskap se basiese behoeftes te voorsien.
Die afgelope paar maande moes ons talle diensleweringbetogings in die land aanskou. Nes geen mens perfek is nie, is ook geen party perfek nie en bevat elkeen sy eie struikelblokke.
Rassisme, kwotas in sport, korrupsie, private stralers, spy tapes en talle ander sake is belangrik.
Maar wat ons baie keer vergeet is om realistiese oplossings op die agenda te plaas wat die daaglikse bestaan van veral die armes raak.
Terwyl ons worry oor ’n nuwe jet vir die president of ’n rassistiese post op sosiale media, is daar ’n ouma wat omsien na haar vyf kleinkinders en wonder waar gaan sy môreaand se ete kry. Terwyl ons kwotas in sport bespreek, het die ouers van ’n talentvolle jong sportspeler nie die geld om eens oefenklere vir daardie speler te koop nie.
Ja, hierdie verkiesing is nes die vorige en dié wat sal kom, belangrik.

Hierdie munisipale verkiesing is ’n geleentheid vir die kieser om vir hul behoeftes te stem, om te stem vir wie ’n regte verandering in hul lewe sal maak en nie net een op papier of ’n poster nie.
Wanneer ek in die stemlokaal gaan en my stembriewe vashou – staan ek alleen. Ek sal my asem ophou en dink aan ongeag hoe onvolmaak ons demokratiese proses mag wees of nie, dit bly ’n voorreg vir my om my kruisie te maak. ’n Voorreg wat my grootouers nooit gehad en kon geniet het nie.
Ja, ek sal dink aan wat Zuma, Maimane, Malema, Lekota, Buthulezi, Zanele, Godi en die Mulders gesê het, asook beloftes van plaaslike leiers. Maar ek sal ook dink aan Madiba, Oliver, Walter, Albertina, Helen, Dullah, Kader, Ashley en die talle ander wat ’n duur prys betaal het vir my om hierdie verantwoordelikheid te geniet.
Ek sal ’n oomblik neem en dink aan die talle uitdagings in my gemeenskap en wie in my mening die beste dit kan aanspreek.
Ek sal dink aan menseregte, vryheid van spraak, die media, vryheid om aan ’n organisasie van my keuse te behoort. Ek sal ook dink aan die regte van minderheidsgroepe, diversiteit en ’n droom van samehorigheid.
Ek sal met die stembriewe in my hand ook dink aan armoede, maatskaplike uitdagings soos dwelmmisbruik, tienerswangerskap, MIV, werkloosheid, bendegeweld en die stigma teen my LGBTI (gay) vriende.
Ek sal dink aan vrede en hoop dat jy ook jou stem wys sal gebruik.
Geniet die verantwoordelikheid om te stem. Stem met trots en loop by die stembus weg met die wete dat jy die regte ding gedoen het.

Dit gaan oor jou kruisie!
  • Oorspronklike rubriek het in Paarl Post van Donderdag 28 Julie 2016 verskyn.

Sunday, 10 May 2015

Our values will guide us to victory

Speech was delivered by Mmusi Maimane MP, after being announced as the newly elected DA Federal Leader.

Video of Announcement

Friends, colleagues, fellow Democrats, Bagaetsho, Dumelang. 

It is wonderful to be here in the Eastern Cape, my ancestral home. Ndizalwa yintombi yakwaMaduna, OoGubevu, OoJiyane, OoTiba kumandla waseCofimvaba

The great South African novelist Nadine Gordimer once said: “A truly living human being cannot remain neutral.” 

I guess that’s why, when I look around this hall, I see so many people who are truly alive.

All of us are animated by the idea of building a better tomorrow. All of us carry the belief that, out of the ashes of apartheid, a prosperous and united South Africa can emerge. 

Sometimes we disagree with each other because we care so much about the future we want to build. And that is okay.

It is healthy for us to engage in robust debate. But, equally, there is no room in this party for those who seek to divide, or those who mobilise on race. 

We must challenge each other’s ideas in a constructive manner. For this is how we learn from each other and grow stronger. 

In this campaign, we have had debates on television, on radio and on the pages of newspapers.

We have crisscrossed the country to put forward our ideas and challenge the ideas of our opponents. 

In the process, we have shown South Africa what it means to be a truly democratic party, united in its diversity.

Our party remains strong, even when we disagree with each other, because it is built on a rock solid foundation of shared values. 

That’s what makes us different from other parties. We contest elections, and when they are over, we work together to fight our real enemies. Our real enemies are poverty, unemployment and inequality.

And so I want to say to all of you, whether or not you voted for me, let us unite today behind our shared values.

We are guided by our values. It is our values that unite us. And I want to tell you today: it is our values that will lead us to victory.

That is because we stand together with many South Africans who share the same set of values as us. 

The people who share our values cannot be defined by race or by class. They do not live in a particular part of the country. 

The people who share our values are the millions of people, from all backgrounds, who want to work hard, to provide for their families and to live in peace.

Our values can be summed up in these three words: 

Freedom, Fairness and Opportunity.

In a free society every individual has the freedom to make their own choices about the life they want to live. That is why we completely reject discrimination on the basis of race, gender and sexual orientation.

In a free society every person has the power to improve their lives, because freedom means nothing without opportunities. Every citizen must be given a chance to be the best they can be.

I know the difference that opportunity can make to a person’s life. 

Like many people living in Gauteng, my parents were migrant labourers who had come to eGoli in search of a better life.

My mother was raised in the Eastern Cape with her parents and 6 siblings. My father, landless and jobless, came from the former Bophuthatswana in the 1960s to settle in Kagiso on the West Rand. 

My parents worked hard to give us the opportunities they never had. I went to a state school in Roodeport and did well enough to get into university. 

I was lucky to be given these opportunities. And my parents were loving and supportive. They gave me the confidence to seize each opportunity that came my way.

They are here with me today. Mme le Papa, Ke A leboga. 

My parents have not always agreed with my political choices, but I know they are proud that I am in a party that opens up opportunities. A party that has today elected the child of a cashier as its Leader.

Not everybody I grew up with has had the same opportunities as me.

I have a cousin who, like me, grew up in Dobsonville. He was raised by a single mother who did her best to provide for the family on her very small income.

My cousin went to a school where the teachers often arrived late and sometimes not at all. Most of the kids never had textbooks, and there were no after-school activities to keep the kids off the streets. 

My cousin dropped out and never managed to get his matric.

He has been without work now for several years. As a consequence, he has been lured into a life of drug abuse and criminality. At the age of just twenty-five, he is unemployed. Worse than this, he is unemployable.

This is the tragic story of too many young South Africans. The hope and promise of 1994 has no meaning for them.

It is a fact that most young black South Africans continue to be denied access to opportunity, just as their parents were during apartheid.

This is what we must change if we are to succeed as a nation. As Democrats, we will work tirelessly to create a fairer society. 

A fair society is a more equal society. It is a society where every child, whether they are born in Soweto or Sandton, has the same chance of making a success of their lives.

A fair society is also a non-racial society. And I want to make it absolutely clear today that non-racialism does not mean being colour-blind. 

We cannot pretend that apartheid never happened. We cannot ignore the fact that apartheid was a system that defined us by the colour of our skin. 

It was a system that could put a pencil through your hair. A system that dictated where you could live, where you could work and who you could marry. 

These experiences shaped me, just like they shaped so many young black people of my generation. And that is why I simply don’t agree with those who say they don’t see colour. Because, if you don’t see that I’m black, then you don’t see me.

This doesn’t mean our skin colour must define us forever. The system of racial classification devised by Hendrik Verwoerd was evil and deplorable, and we cannot stay trapped in that way of thinking. 

We must triumph over the evil of apartheid by building a new bridge into a new future. We must not remain victims of our yesterday, we must believe in tomorrow. 
We can transcend race. But this can only happen if every South African acknowledges the injustices of apartheid; and it can only happen if we all recognise that the racial inequality of the past remains with us today.
And so we will stand firm on our commitment to implement policies that redress the legacy of the past. 
We will stay resolutely committed to a system of social security to protect people from extreme poverty.
Where we govern, we will continue to deliver high quality basic services such as water, electricity and sanitation.
We will focus on education because too many children still receive an inferior education, and we know that a good education is the foundation of a successful life. 
And, above all, we will push for measures to grow our economy and create jobs. 

Democrats, South Africans

Unemployment in South Africa stands at 36%. Of those who are unemployed, 66% are young people, just like my cousin. 

Democrats, we simply cannot go on like this. As a party we are quick to get angry about the sustained attack on our constitution and our institutions. But we must be equally angry at the insider-outsider economic policies that have trapped too many of our people in poverty for far too long.

We must structure the economy so that young people have opportunities to start small businesses, an economy where we leverage state owned enterprises as skills incubators by offering apprenticeships.  

We must move vigorously to roll out a youth wage subsidy that will encourage private enterprises to absorb young school leavers. This is essential so that they can access skills and knowledge to build successful careers. 

We need a job-creating labour regime where trade unions protect their members, but not at the expense of keeping unemployed people locked out of the economy.

On Friday I visited Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University here in Port Elizabeth. I met young people there who burn with ambition to create a better tomorrow for themselves. Like the students of Fort Hare, they are dreaming of a different future, and they are making a different choice.

They dream of a society where the children of domestic workers can go to university and emerge as teachers, lawyers and doctors. They want freedom that they can use. 

Freedom, fairness and opportunity. These are our values. 

They are the values that will guide us to victory because so many South Africans share them. 
These values will underscore the message of hope we will take to the nation in the coming years. 
We will show South Africa that, when Nelson Mandela died, his dream of a rainbow nation did not die with him. 
So let me quote the words of American writer Maya Angelou, who passed away shortly after our beloved Madiba.
She said:
“The thing to do, it seems to me, is to prepare yourself so you can be a rainbow in somebody else's cloud. Somebody who may not look like you. Who may not call God the same name you call God - if they call God at all. I may not dance your dances or speak your language. But be a blessing to somebody.” 

Democrats, we need to be a blessing to everybody.

We need to be able to connect with every South African who shares our values but does not yet vote for us.

We need to overcome racial, cultural, religious and economic barriers and build one nation, with one future. 

This was the journey that Tony Leon began in 1994. When he took over the DP, it was a tiny suburban party. But he managed to broaden the DA’s appeal to new voters, increasing the party’s support from 1.7% to 12% in just ten years.

When Helen Zille was elected just eight years ago, she promised to take this project to a whole level. It is worth recalling today what she said in her acceptance speech back in 2007:

“We must convince all South Africans that our party is truly a home for all the people. And to do that, we cannot merely tell them, we must show them.   We must not only welcome new members, but create opportunities for new leaders to emerge, so that our party looks and feels like the nation we want to lead.”

You just have to look around this hall to see that Helen achieved her objective. Her resolute commitment to diversify the party’s leadership, membership and support base was one of the reasons we were able to double our votes in her eight years as leader – from 1.9 million to just over 4 million.

Helen Zille. Siyabulela!

Democrats, the next part of the DA story still needs to be written. 
I want it to be the story of how the DA challenged for power at a national level and won.
I want it to be the story of a party that was victorious because it stayed true to its values.
I want it to be the story of how a non-racial party built a political home for all South Africans. 
‘n Samelewing waar jou toekoms nie bepaal word deur die kleur van jou vel nie.

Democrats, it is not going to be easy.
It will be difficult because our goal is to win support from voters of all races, at the very moment that racial mobilisation is on the rise. 
Those who mobilise on race have no interest in building our nation. Their goal is to break down the constitutional democracy that so many great South Africans painstakingly built.

As the legendary Sophiatown poet, Don Materra once wrote: 
Bulldozers have power.
They can take apart in a few minutes
all that has been built up over the years
and raised over generations
and generations of children
The power of destroying
the pain of being destroyed,
Dust ...

Democrats, we need to make sure that our message of hope is more powerful than their message of hate.
While they are tearing down statues, we will be building schools and creating jobs.
While they illegally invade land, we will be implementing successful land reform programmes.
While they trade on the divisions of the past, we will position the DA as the party of tomorrow. 
While they play on people’s fears, we will connect with voters on the basis of shared values.
We must defend the Constitution of the Republic at all costs.
We must ensure that everyone is equal before the law. 
We must continue to pursue our legal battles against the powerful and the corrupt.
So President Zuma, if you are watching, please note: we are still coming for you.
Make no mistake Mr President, you will have the day in court you have been asking for.

You see, Democrats, nobody is above the law. And, equally so, no political party has the divine right to rule this country.
So when we talk of a second transition, we refer to the process of political power shifting from one party to another peacefully through the ballot box.

Democrats, we can make historic gains in the local elections next year.
We will retain the City of Cape Town.
We can win power in Tshwane, our nation’s capital.
We can even win power in Johannesburg, our country’s economic heartland.
And, we can win power right here in Nelson Mandela Bay.

Democrats, the future is bright if we all work together as a team. And I know that we will emerge from this Congress strong and united. 

I am deeply humbled by the opportunity to serve as your leader. I will do my best for all of you. And I know that the entire leadership team elected today will do the same, as will our leaders in governments across South Africa. We will serve the people, not the other way around.

In closing, I would like to thank my incredible campaign team. Honourable Members, you ran a truly brilliant and positive campaign. You made history, and to you, I pay tribute.

And, finally, to my gorgeous wife, who has to put up with this crazy life I have chosen. Thank you for supporting me during tough times. And thank you for being a wonderful mother to our children KG and Daniel. You are a true champion. Together, let’s pursue the dream of a truly liberated South Africa.

Democrats, I want to leave you with one final thought.
When we leave Port Elizabeth today, every step we take will be one step closer to the Union Buildings. 
We must and we will win power in our lifetime. We will be the next government of this beautiful country.

Because change is coming! 

Morena Boloka Setchaba sa heso 
God seën Afrika 
Nkosi sikelel' iafrika
Let us live and strive for freedom, in South Africa our land.


Amandla!