Earl September

My photo
I write what ever comes to mind. Real is me and my views/opinion. Be Yourself, be REAL Open-minded young South African who loves to follow South African politics and social issues. I try not to limit myself as I'm capable of more than where I'm now.
Showing posts with label Helen Zille. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Helen Zille. Show all posts

Monday, 13 May 2019

Winde vote for consistency or change


Votes have been counted, seats allocated and now the real work begins.
The first task of the Premier-designate, Alan Winde, will be to assemble his yes-men and woman. This includes his cabinet and over the following two weeks he will be consulting to appoint that team.

Of the former DA MPLs four are retiring, two moving to the National Assembly and 20 will be returning to the Western Cape Provincial Parliament. Except for Helen Zille retiring her entire cabinet is returning.  Winde can be consistent and only appoint a replacement for himself.

Winde and his DA caucus could also use to their advantage the fact that only 27.80% or 5 of the 18 opposition MPLs are former members and 66.70% have never served in a legislature.
A possible successor for Winde at Community Safety is chairperson of the standing committee, Mirreile Wenger. She knows the portfolio, is competent and being female counts in her favour. Being married to the whistleblower in the Patricia de Lille-saga, Craig Kesson, might raise the eyebrows though and could make a few people uncomfortable.

Another option is moving Albert Fritz, who previously occupied the position. I have two scenarios replacing Fritz at Social Development.
First scenario is Anroux Marais and being replaced at Arts, Culture and Sport by Masizole Mnqasela (let’s be honest his promotion is long overdue).
Second scenario is dr. Ivan Meyer, he previously occupied the position. This leaves vacant the all-important finance portfolio.

A prominent DA member, who served as shadow finance minister, is however moving to the legislature and rumour has it that David Maynier has his eye on the finance ministry.
Maynier was Winde’s campaign manager and fit for purpose, I have no doubt that he will be included in the executive council. The trick is that the finance portfolio is viewed as second most senior after that of premier, and both these occupied by white men in a coloured majority province is sending the wrong message.

Consistency might be a safer bet. Meyer is also deputy federal chairperson of the DA and the most senior coloured leader in the party.
Meyer could make space for Maynier and move to Local Government and Development Planning, but it is highly unlikely that Anton Bredell will move.

A likely portfolio for Bredell, who is provincial chairperson, would be to move to the vacant Chief Whip position. Some will consider this a demotion and others might raise concern at separating party and state as both positions are administrative.

If Bredell is not the new Chief Whip someone who also deserves to be considered is Beverley Schafer. Having a woman in this portfolio could also be the DA silencing critics that their shortage of female leaders.
Schafer’s move to the 5th floor leaves vacant the Economic Opportunities portfolio, one she could possible be handing over to Maynier – unless the unlikely happen and he and Meyer swap portfolios.
Should Schafer not move another strong contender for Chief Whip is Andricus van der Westhuizen. The former MP’s move to the provincial legislature is surely not to be closer to retirement. In showing confidence in the next generation the Deputy Chief Whip position could likely go to Daylin Mitchell. To date the youngest person to become WCPP MPL and who did well in his first term.

Van der Westhuizen could likely also be deputy speaker. He was once upon a time the speaker of Stellenbosch Municipality. Another possible candidate for this position is Masizole Mnqasela, whose promotion as said is long overdue.

In the fifth parliament the second most important portfolio was occupied by a coloured woman. Considering that the former deputy speaker, Piet Pretorius, retired it is highly unlikely the DA will replace Sharna Fernandez as speaker. Despite some minor flaws, for a first term member and speaker she did well. With the Patricia de Lille-saga still fresh, not retaining her opens a can of worms – critics will have a field day ‘attacking’ the DA of how people of colour, especially woman, are rejected/demoted if they become too popular.


So here’s my three list:

Sunday, 5 November 2017

2019: status quo vs. change to unite

 On Monday 6 November 2017 the governing party in the second largest municipality – and thus biggest constituency – in the province elects a new leadership.
This internal election is the first since the 2016 local government election. Following that election the party not only became the first political party to win a consecutive local government election in Drakenstein, but also increased their vote with nearly 10%.  
In 2016 the DA increased their support in the Paarl East – coloured – area, especially Chicago, Amstelhof, Nederburg, Denneburg. The DA also took two ANC stronghold wards, Gouda and Simondium with 60 and 62% respectively. It however did not show any major increase in so-called “white-areas”. In Wellington the DA’s support took a dip in most of the wards.

Above statistics are important if one considers the candidates contesting the internal election. Both candidates for chairperson are from the Paarl-East area, while those standing for deputy are from Wellington and Northern-Paarl. Two of the candidates vying for secretary are from Mbekweni and the other from Paarl-East. The treasurer position is the only uncontested position and incumbent, Gert Combrink – who also happens to be the DA West Region Treasurer – will return for another term.

There appears to only be one slate, with all other candidates campaigning as individuals. Considering the 2016 outcome and party’s targets for 2019, the expectation is that the party would focus at having a more diverse team on local level, representing all the areas of the Constituency. For some time now the DA’s been trying to make inroads in Mbekweni. Having two of three candidates for a position from the area will most likely split the votes from Mbekweni. Two of the three standing for secretary are former activist and first time councillors and the third a former ANC Councillor, with more political experience than her competitors. My expectation from any secretary is also to atleast be able to spell or use spell-checker. From her campaign post though it would appear as if this is a weakness of one of the candidates – she even managed to get the names and titles wrong of those on her slate.

The competition for deputy chairperson is between a “veteran” and an activist. What delegates might want to consider is where the two candidates campaigned during the 2016 local elections, the DA’s support dropped in the area the one campaigned and increased in the area the other one campaigned. Both seem committed to the cause; just one is on a slate and the other not. And that will either turnout to be good or bad.

Perhaps important to remind oneself the DA believes in freedom, fairness and opportunity. It also preaches separation of party and state. Some examples are during Helen Zille’s term as party leader in Parliament Sandra Botha, Athol Trollip, Lindiwe Mazibuko and Mmusi Maimane occupied the role of Parliamentary Leader (Leader of the Official Opposition).
In the Western Cape with Helen Zille leading the provincial government, Theuns Botha, Ivan Meyer, Patricia de Lille and Bonginkosi Madikizela was party leader.
In the City of Cape Town Helen Zille, Dan Plato and Patricia de Lille led the local government, while Grant Pascoe, Shaun August and now Grant Twigg led the party in the metro.

The race for Chairperson is always interesting, and it becomes even more interesting when one of the candidates is a woman. 
Note despite Helen Zille’s successful tenure as party leader, the DA has not exactly broken the glass ceiling for woman leaders in the party. 
Delegates will have to vote between incumbent Chairperson, Conrad Poole, and outgoing Secretary, Wendy Philander.

I have the privilege to have gotten to known both candidates – both caring individuals, who want to make the world better. Both I gotten to know before they became councillors, ironically ward councillors. I saw the election of Conrad during a by-election and Wendy in 2011. During their term as ward councillors both worked hard and people of their wards still hold them in high regard – because both continue to work hard for the people they serve.

Both candidates have used each opportunity that crossed their path.
Wendy, current DA Women’s Network Chairperson, was also part of a Swedish exchange program for woman in local government – something I still think Drakenstein should, but they not, use to their advantage. She served one term on the executive mayoral committee, in the key portfolio of housing.
Conrad was recently elected as DA West Region Deputy Chairman and on the provincial executive as additional member. He’s in his third term as councillor and current executive mayor.

Conrad’s campaign is based on the success of the party under his leadership. The party grew from receiving 32% of the vote in 2006 to 66% in 2016, not without teething problems.
Wendy’s campaign is based on the party’s mission of Freedom, Fairness & Opportunity, creating a platform to develop the next generation, making progress together.

Doing research for this blog it became evident that the party is very much divided. This week DA founder Helen Suzman would have celebrated her centenary. Will Drakenstein’s gift to her be that the status quo is enough to carry the party to 2019 or will the party heading towards 2019, change; unite and develop to increase its support?

Sunday, 19 February 2017

Race vs. Party

Patricia de Lille’s resignation as leader of the DA in the Western Cape sure came as a shock for many. And her reason: to only focus on her role and govern as executive mayor of the Mother City.
In Mother of (only) the City I mention that you never trust everything you being told in politics and that it’s a game of practically anything goes. But now the DA's stronghold province is faced with electing a new leader...

Prior to the announcement end of January rumours have been going around about some trying to get Western Cape Premier and former DA Federal Leader, Helen Zille, to take on De Lille for the provincial leadership at the next congress.
Both De Lille and Zille are known for supporting change and younger leaders. One can thus not be blamed for assuming the two iron ladies reached a truce to allow the young(er) guard to rise.

Front-runners in the provincial race appear to be Acting Provincial Leader, Bonginkosi Madikizela, and DA Cape Metro Chairman, Shaun August.
In a discreet way the two have been campaigning on Facebook.
August’s campaign is highlighting the success of the party in the metro, under his leadership.
Madikizela’s campaign seems to be to get the support of the big guns to endorse him.

Call me crazy but one of the many random thoughts I had was that this is still De Lille vs. Zille – August is one of the former ID leader’s trusted aides and Madikizela once worked in the office of the former Mayor.
Apart from my random thoughts though, from social media it looks like August is leading.

Important maybe to mention the Interim Provincial Leader will be elected by ±120 delegates, of whom fifty percent of the total council comprise members of the Metro-region.

The two politicians are however not the only ones in the race.
Western Cape Standing Committee Chairman for Cultural Affairs and Sport, adv. Lennit Max, is also trying again. The former Western Cape ID leader, without any success, took part in the 2015, 2010 and 2007 race.
Also in the race is the only female, Dr. Arlene Adams, a City of Cape Town councillor. The former academic in a recent interview said: “If you don’t enter a race‚ you lose 100%. For a candidate‚ I have given myself a 25% chance”.
As for being the only female, competing to take over the position previously held by a female, Adams said she taught there would be more women putting themselves forward.
“I am stepping forward as a woman representing‚ embodying those people who do not speak and I am hoping they will understand that’s what the party is about.”

Delegates heading to Worcester will have to ask themselves if they voting for race, to see who crosses first, or for the party.
Just for those coming with majority in the province are coloureds, so a coloured should lead: note that in the North West, Limpopo and Eastern Cape where more than 90% of the population is black, the party leader is coloured (Joe McGluwa) and white (Jacques Smalle and Athol Trollip) respectively.

What is interesting about this election is that the person would possibly only be Interim leader until the provincial elective congress in August 2017 (should he or she not stand again).

The party won’t admit its factions and infighting – like who would – but they there. [And this is not me campaigning] but why not go for a neutral interim leader, who can keep the ship steady until the Provincial Elective Congress.
While the last academic, dr. Wilmot James, ran unsuccessfully for a leadership position, I am tempted to say the unknown dr. Adams could be a safe bet.
To build on the success of the party August, who already proven himself in the Metro-region and is DA Chief Whip in the City council, might not be a bad choice.
One could also argue adv. Max, who is a former provincial police chief, might be what the party needs to address the growing crime rate.
If you want to be traditional though, Madikizela who is also provincial housing minister and elected deputy party leader would be your choice.

Given the campaigning of not only the past three weeks, but months, delegates will have to ask do we vote for the race or the party?

And if the 2016 US Presidential election taught us anything: it’s don’t trust social media, it’s anything goes.

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Mother of (only) the City

In politics you never trust everything you being told. It’s a game of practically anything goes.
No matter how true it might be, Patricia De Lille’s reasons for resigning as Leader of the Democratic Alliance in the Western Cape had a number of things running through my mind.

As Mayor of the Mother City she might lead the biggest DA caucus, but she’s not the first to be a government and party leader. See below for other DA leaders in Government
This iron lady has also never shy away from a challenge and not even personal matters can prevent her from giving her best. De Lille also has strong and competent teams supporting her as executive mayor and provincial leader. With the newly revamped Mayco, with four mini-mayors and deputy executive mayor now without a portfolio one would assume it would lift the burden on the City’s number one.


De Lille, known by many for her integrity, cited making our cities, under a DA-government, great again – might be true. But one cannot ignore a few things, most notably her unofficial campaign heading to Leeuwenhof.

The former leader of the Independent Democrats has been tipped at becoming Premier if the DA retains its majority in the Western Cape in 2019. Former DA leader, Premier Helen Zille, is also rumoured to challenge De Lille for the provincial leadership later in November.

This resignation thus paves the way for the provincial Deputy Leader, Bonginkosi Madikizela, to be interim provincial leader. This could be part of De Lille and possibly the DA’s campaign to attract votes heading towards 2019. It could also be part of De Lille’s counter or an agreement to a possible Zille challenge for the November provincial congress.
Both Zille and De Lille are known for supporting change and new leaders emerging and Madikizela is one of the rising stars.

There however rumours doing the rounds that De Lille appeared before a disciplinary hearing. DA officials are mum on this but one can’t help but wonder, what if?
The rumour can make sense for the following:
National DA leadership rapping provincial leadership over the knuckles – for losing or decline support in certain municipalities – and De Lille as leader takes the blame.
Could also be that De Lille took the fall for the Kannaland caucus entering into a coalition with the ANC or the appointment of poo-protester, Loyiso Nkhola, as ESO (executive support officer) in the City of Cape Town.

I really find it difficult to believe that the first female to lead a political party cannot multitask between being both a party and government leader. De Lille was PAC Chief Whip and Chairperson of the Standing Committee on Transport (during the first democratic Parliament), leader of the Independent Democrats and Western Cape Social Development minister and served one term as Mayor and being DA provincial leader. Reasons thus given just don’t add up, considering there are others who juggle or juggled between party and government duties.

Helen Zille was Executive Mayor and DA Federal Leader. Dr. Ivan Meyer is Western Cape Finance Minister and DA Deputy Federal Chairperson, Bonginkosi Madikizela is provincial deputy leader and Western Cape Housing Minister. While provincial Social Development minister, adv. Albert Fritz and Eden Executive Mayor, Memory Booysen are both deputy provincial chairpersons and Tijmen van Essen (Swartland Executive Mayor) and Dan Plato (WC Community Safety minister) both additional members on the provincial leadership.


Whichever option you choose, Patricia de Lille now only mother to the City is good for the nearly 4 million residents in Cape Town, but possibly not for the DA and more than 2 million others in the rest of the Western Cape.

Sunday, 10 May 2015

Our values will guide us to victory

Speech was delivered by Mmusi Maimane MP, after being announced as the newly elected DA Federal Leader.

Video of Announcement

Friends, colleagues, fellow Democrats, Bagaetsho, Dumelang. 

It is wonderful to be here in the Eastern Cape, my ancestral home. Ndizalwa yintombi yakwaMaduna, OoGubevu, OoJiyane, OoTiba kumandla waseCofimvaba

The great South African novelist Nadine Gordimer once said: “A truly living human being cannot remain neutral.” 

I guess that’s why, when I look around this hall, I see so many people who are truly alive.

All of us are animated by the idea of building a better tomorrow. All of us carry the belief that, out of the ashes of apartheid, a prosperous and united South Africa can emerge. 

Sometimes we disagree with each other because we care so much about the future we want to build. And that is okay.

It is healthy for us to engage in robust debate. But, equally, there is no room in this party for those who seek to divide, or those who mobilise on race. 

We must challenge each other’s ideas in a constructive manner. For this is how we learn from each other and grow stronger. 

In this campaign, we have had debates on television, on radio and on the pages of newspapers.

We have crisscrossed the country to put forward our ideas and challenge the ideas of our opponents. 

In the process, we have shown South Africa what it means to be a truly democratic party, united in its diversity.

Our party remains strong, even when we disagree with each other, because it is built on a rock solid foundation of shared values. 

That’s what makes us different from other parties. We contest elections, and when they are over, we work together to fight our real enemies. Our real enemies are poverty, unemployment and inequality.

And so I want to say to all of you, whether or not you voted for me, let us unite today behind our shared values.

We are guided by our values. It is our values that unite us. And I want to tell you today: it is our values that will lead us to victory.

That is because we stand together with many South Africans who share the same set of values as us. 

The people who share our values cannot be defined by race or by class. They do not live in a particular part of the country. 

The people who share our values are the millions of people, from all backgrounds, who want to work hard, to provide for their families and to live in peace.

Our values can be summed up in these three words: 

Freedom, Fairness and Opportunity.

In a free society every individual has the freedom to make their own choices about the life they want to live. That is why we completely reject discrimination on the basis of race, gender and sexual orientation.

In a free society every person has the power to improve their lives, because freedom means nothing without opportunities. Every citizen must be given a chance to be the best they can be.

I know the difference that opportunity can make to a person’s life. 

Like many people living in Gauteng, my parents were migrant labourers who had come to eGoli in search of a better life.

My mother was raised in the Eastern Cape with her parents and 6 siblings. My father, landless and jobless, came from the former Bophuthatswana in the 1960s to settle in Kagiso on the West Rand. 

My parents worked hard to give us the opportunities they never had. I went to a state school in Roodeport and did well enough to get into university. 

I was lucky to be given these opportunities. And my parents were loving and supportive. They gave me the confidence to seize each opportunity that came my way.

They are here with me today. Mme le Papa, Ke A leboga. 

My parents have not always agreed with my political choices, but I know they are proud that I am in a party that opens up opportunities. A party that has today elected the child of a cashier as its Leader.

Not everybody I grew up with has had the same opportunities as me.

I have a cousin who, like me, grew up in Dobsonville. He was raised by a single mother who did her best to provide for the family on her very small income.

My cousin went to a school where the teachers often arrived late and sometimes not at all. Most of the kids never had textbooks, and there were no after-school activities to keep the kids off the streets. 

My cousin dropped out and never managed to get his matric.

He has been without work now for several years. As a consequence, he has been lured into a life of drug abuse and criminality. At the age of just twenty-five, he is unemployed. Worse than this, he is unemployable.

This is the tragic story of too many young South Africans. The hope and promise of 1994 has no meaning for them.

It is a fact that most young black South Africans continue to be denied access to opportunity, just as their parents were during apartheid.

This is what we must change if we are to succeed as a nation. As Democrats, we will work tirelessly to create a fairer society. 

A fair society is a more equal society. It is a society where every child, whether they are born in Soweto or Sandton, has the same chance of making a success of their lives.

A fair society is also a non-racial society. And I want to make it absolutely clear today that non-racialism does not mean being colour-blind. 

We cannot pretend that apartheid never happened. We cannot ignore the fact that apartheid was a system that defined us by the colour of our skin. 

It was a system that could put a pencil through your hair. A system that dictated where you could live, where you could work and who you could marry. 

These experiences shaped me, just like they shaped so many young black people of my generation. And that is why I simply don’t agree with those who say they don’t see colour. Because, if you don’t see that I’m black, then you don’t see me.

This doesn’t mean our skin colour must define us forever. The system of racial classification devised by Hendrik Verwoerd was evil and deplorable, and we cannot stay trapped in that way of thinking. 

We must triumph over the evil of apartheid by building a new bridge into a new future. We must not remain victims of our yesterday, we must believe in tomorrow. 
We can transcend race. But this can only happen if every South African acknowledges the injustices of apartheid; and it can only happen if we all recognise that the racial inequality of the past remains with us today.
And so we will stand firm on our commitment to implement policies that redress the legacy of the past. 
We will stay resolutely committed to a system of social security to protect people from extreme poverty.
Where we govern, we will continue to deliver high quality basic services such as water, electricity and sanitation.
We will focus on education because too many children still receive an inferior education, and we know that a good education is the foundation of a successful life. 
And, above all, we will push for measures to grow our economy and create jobs. 

Democrats, South Africans

Unemployment in South Africa stands at 36%. Of those who are unemployed, 66% are young people, just like my cousin. 

Democrats, we simply cannot go on like this. As a party we are quick to get angry about the sustained attack on our constitution and our institutions. But we must be equally angry at the insider-outsider economic policies that have trapped too many of our people in poverty for far too long.

We must structure the economy so that young people have opportunities to start small businesses, an economy where we leverage state owned enterprises as skills incubators by offering apprenticeships.  

We must move vigorously to roll out a youth wage subsidy that will encourage private enterprises to absorb young school leavers. This is essential so that they can access skills and knowledge to build successful careers. 

We need a job-creating labour regime where trade unions protect their members, but not at the expense of keeping unemployed people locked out of the economy.

On Friday I visited Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University here in Port Elizabeth. I met young people there who burn with ambition to create a better tomorrow for themselves. Like the students of Fort Hare, they are dreaming of a different future, and they are making a different choice.

They dream of a society where the children of domestic workers can go to university and emerge as teachers, lawyers and doctors. They want freedom that they can use. 

Freedom, fairness and opportunity. These are our values. 

They are the values that will guide us to victory because so many South Africans share them. 
These values will underscore the message of hope we will take to the nation in the coming years. 
We will show South Africa that, when Nelson Mandela died, his dream of a rainbow nation did not die with him. 
So let me quote the words of American writer Maya Angelou, who passed away shortly after our beloved Madiba.
She said:
“The thing to do, it seems to me, is to prepare yourself so you can be a rainbow in somebody else's cloud. Somebody who may not look like you. Who may not call God the same name you call God - if they call God at all. I may not dance your dances or speak your language. But be a blessing to somebody.” 

Democrats, we need to be a blessing to everybody.

We need to be able to connect with every South African who shares our values but does not yet vote for us.

We need to overcome racial, cultural, religious and economic barriers and build one nation, with one future. 

This was the journey that Tony Leon began in 1994. When he took over the DP, it was a tiny suburban party. But he managed to broaden the DA’s appeal to new voters, increasing the party’s support from 1.7% to 12% in just ten years.

When Helen Zille was elected just eight years ago, she promised to take this project to a whole level. It is worth recalling today what she said in her acceptance speech back in 2007:

“We must convince all South Africans that our party is truly a home for all the people. And to do that, we cannot merely tell them, we must show them.   We must not only welcome new members, but create opportunities for new leaders to emerge, so that our party looks and feels like the nation we want to lead.”

You just have to look around this hall to see that Helen achieved her objective. Her resolute commitment to diversify the party’s leadership, membership and support base was one of the reasons we were able to double our votes in her eight years as leader – from 1.9 million to just over 4 million.

Helen Zille. Siyabulela!

Democrats, the next part of the DA story still needs to be written. 
I want it to be the story of how the DA challenged for power at a national level and won.
I want it to be the story of a party that was victorious because it stayed true to its values.
I want it to be the story of how a non-racial party built a political home for all South Africans. 
‘n Samelewing waar jou toekoms nie bepaal word deur die kleur van jou vel nie.

Democrats, it is not going to be easy.
It will be difficult because our goal is to win support from voters of all races, at the very moment that racial mobilisation is on the rise. 
Those who mobilise on race have no interest in building our nation. Their goal is to break down the constitutional democracy that so many great South Africans painstakingly built.

As the legendary Sophiatown poet, Don Materra once wrote: 
Bulldozers have power.
They can take apart in a few minutes
all that has been built up over the years
and raised over generations
and generations of children
The power of destroying
the pain of being destroyed,
Dust ...

Democrats, we need to make sure that our message of hope is more powerful than their message of hate.
While they are tearing down statues, we will be building schools and creating jobs.
While they illegally invade land, we will be implementing successful land reform programmes.
While they trade on the divisions of the past, we will position the DA as the party of tomorrow. 
While they play on people’s fears, we will connect with voters on the basis of shared values.
We must defend the Constitution of the Republic at all costs.
We must ensure that everyone is equal before the law. 
We must continue to pursue our legal battles against the powerful and the corrupt.
So President Zuma, if you are watching, please note: we are still coming for you.
Make no mistake Mr President, you will have the day in court you have been asking for.

You see, Democrats, nobody is above the law. And, equally so, no political party has the divine right to rule this country.
So when we talk of a second transition, we refer to the process of political power shifting from one party to another peacefully through the ballot box.

Democrats, we can make historic gains in the local elections next year.
We will retain the City of Cape Town.
We can win power in Tshwane, our nation’s capital.
We can even win power in Johannesburg, our country’s economic heartland.
And, we can win power right here in Nelson Mandela Bay.

Democrats, the future is bright if we all work together as a team. And I know that we will emerge from this Congress strong and united. 

I am deeply humbled by the opportunity to serve as your leader. I will do my best for all of you. And I know that the entire leadership team elected today will do the same, as will our leaders in governments across South Africa. We will serve the people, not the other way around.

In closing, I would like to thank my incredible campaign team. Honourable Members, you ran a truly brilliant and positive campaign. You made history, and to you, I pay tribute.

And, finally, to my gorgeous wife, who has to put up with this crazy life I have chosen. Thank you for supporting me during tough times. And thank you for being a wonderful mother to our children KG and Daniel. You are a true champion. Together, let’s pursue the dream of a truly liberated South Africa.

Democrats, I want to leave you with one final thought.
When we leave Port Elizabeth today, every step we take will be one step closer to the Union Buildings. 
We must and we will win power in our lifetime. We will be the next government of this beautiful country.

Because change is coming! 

Morena Boloka Setchaba sa heso 
God seën Afrika 
Nkosi sikelel' iafrika
Let us live and strive for freedom, in South Africa our land.


Amandla!

Monday, 23 February 2015

Point of Order to disrupt




Democracy was the biggest loser when the ANC in the Western Cape Legislature disappointed me on Friday 20th February 2015. Their disruptions took place less than 24 hours after the head of state appealed to all to be calm, respect our democratic institutions and to play the ball not the man.

The ANC clearly copied the EFF when starting the sitting with a Point of Order, they also copied the EFF by trying to make it as difficult as possible for the Speaker and for her to call in security to remove members. It is clear parties entered the chamber with a plan.
While both parties made some blunders no one really scored, but it is the ANC who looks like the biggest loser.

Whether intentional or not, EFF tactics were copied disrupting a sitting of a democratic institution. This happened at Parliament and now also at two provincial legislatures. While these actions show after two decades our democracy is maturing, it also holds a threat as soon municipal councillors will copy these disruptive tactics and try it during their meetings – that would be a sad day for democracy as municipal councils meet once a quarter and service delivery will suffer from this.

ANC Chief Whip, Pierre Uys, was within his right to raise a point of order. His point of order was on an incident that occurred on December 4th, 2014 – where racist remarks were made by the Premier of the Western Cape and the Leader of the Official Opposition in the legislature, the Zille withdrew her remark, but Fransman refused. Speaker Sharna Fernandez responded to Uys' Point of Order – which in all honesty, even though Uys put it in context, felt like a statement.
Having said the above, I agree and feel EFF MPL, Nazier Paulsen, gave a good summary in his response to the events: The Opposition's concerns are valid and nothing prevents the Opposition from still referring the matter for judiciary inquiry if the outcome is still unsatisfactory.

Why the ANC disappointed me:
One should first admit that the ANC MPL’s did not disrupt Premier Helen Zille’s State of the Province Address. The ANC in the legislature did disrupt the house, that prevented the Premier from delivering her State of the Province Address and that is why I’m disappointed as it is the same party who condemned the Economic Freedom Fighters from disrupting a Joint Sitting of Parliament when President Jacob Zuma, had to deliver the State of the Nation Address.

While everyone in the province might not have voted for the DA, all parties accepted the outcome and whether we like it or not Helen Zille was re-elected to lead the province.
When the ANC announced their A-team in June 2014 it said it wants to hold the DA accountable and see real improvements. They failed on both objectives…
I would have loved to hear the premier address the province in outlining what her government is planning to better the lives of all.

The ANC MPLs should have allowed the Premier to deliver her address, after the second adjournment and then hold the DA government accountable on what was not achieved and also debate if the plans will bring real improvement.

The Leader of the Opposition in the House, disappointed me when he raised a point of order about a live feed and what was more disappointing is that fellow MPLs supported his point by trying the correct the Speaker that a live feed has been cut.
Anyone who follows SOPA would know (1) there is no live feed to the TV and (2) the feed that goes from the House to the Parliamentary channel goes via the National Legislature and is not operated by the Western Cape Provincial Parliament. Marius Fransman and Pierre Uys should have checked the facts before making themselves look bad.

A problem can only be addressed if you admit there is one, same with racism – as it is still alive, not only in the Western Cape but South Africa. Allow me my 5 seconds:
It is ironic that the ANC – the same party who says the colourd vote is important – and have a march against racism in the province (a day before the State of the Province Address), decided to ‘attack’ a colourd lady - who has one of the most senior positions in the province - and say she is not capable of being the presiding officer. And to make matters worse, a white male – who happens to be a former member of the National Party started the attack.

As a footnote:
ANC MPLs knew that ‘attacking’ and criticizing Premier Zille would not work and they decided to go for the Speaker. In politics this is probably allowed but accusing her of acting bias and partisan was not fair, given she asked the Chief Whip of the governing party to take his seat and allowed the Chief Whip of the opposition to complete his points of order.
So she made a blunder or two and created room for the opposition to criticize, but she tried to apply the rules, constitution and treated all members equal. To top it all she managed to keep her cool and not call the police for disruptive members.


The ANC had a point of order, but the order of the day was never achieved.

Friday, 7 November 2014

The humble golden boy of the Valley


I was privileged to attend the memorial service of Tinus Linee on Thursday 6th November 2014

WHO WAS TINUS
Linee was diagnosed with motor neurone disease in April 2013 and sadly passed away on Monday 3 November 2014, aged 45, at his home in Paarl.
Marthinus "Tinus" Linee was a South African rugby player, who predominantly played centre. He played all his provincial rugby for Western Province and represented Western Province and the Stormers in Super Rugby. He played nine tour games for the Springboks between 1993 and 1994, but never played in a test for South Africa.
Linee attended Nederburg Primary School along with his future wife, Diana. This is the same school that delivered the likes of former Springbok Chester Williams and former Springbok coach Peter de Villiers.

TRIBUTES
Even before listening to the tributes, as you enter the hall, the attendance by the Paarl community spoke volumes of the golden boy of the valley – as one speaker described him.

Speaker after speaker spoke of a humble person, someone who believed, lived his dream and inspired others.

“Tinus proved how to realise dreams and to strive towards good things,” says adv. Gesie van Deventer, executive mayor of Drakenstein, in a letter to Linee’s widow, Diana.

Executive deputy mayor, Conrad Poole, described him as an ambassador of his own life, who never lost focus.

In his message of encouragement to the mourners, Father Grant Walters said “if you believe something, you live it and Tienie believed and lived as a Christian.”

Hon. Gert Oosthuizen, deputy minister of Sport and Recreation, in his keynote address said to an extend Tinus Linee was larger than live. “We should celebrate his success on and off the field.

Addressing the crowd dr. Nomafrench Mbombo, Western Cape Cultural Affairs and Sport MEC, said as the widow of a former rugby player herself, she recalls and can related to the pain of Diana. She appealed to the rugby community who stood by Linee, to continue supporting Diana now that Tinus is no longer there. “She will need the support now more than ever, don’t leave her behind and forget her.”
The minister apologised to the Linee family for being absent and not supporting them during the 18 months, when they needed her support the most. To his children she said they should remember he’s watching over them.
Mbombo started by saying she does not if Tinus knew what role-model he was for the youth. “He was a rock and role-model for society and our communities needs role-models.”

Breyton Paulse, program director, said in any tragic event, there’s a lesson to learn. “The lesson here is that Tinus Linee and Chester Williams have always been humble and that is the message to our youth, no matter what you achieve, to always remain humble.”

STATE FUNERAL
As the Memorial service started in Paarl, Acting Premier, Anton Bredell issued a statement saying the office of the Premier of the Western Cape takes note of a statement by the Presidency that it did not receive a request by Premier Helen Zille regarding the funeral of the late Linee. Bredell says the provincial government has decided to offer financial assistance for the funeral this coming Saturday in Paarl.

"President Jacob Zuma did not receive a letter from the government of the Western Cape requesting the granting of a provincial official funeral for former rugby player Mr Tinus Linee. The President once again extends his condolences to the family of Mr Linee," reads the statement by thepresidency.

Shortly after this the ANC Western Cape tweeted:
"the DA should stop making cheap party politics of the funeral of former Springbok and WP rugby player Tinus Linee."
"ANC demands of the premier and her cabinet to do whatever within their means to immediately come to the assistance of Linee’s family."

I attended the memorial service and mentioned the attendance alone said this was a Hero of the Valley, a role model for the youth. Reading the statements by both the presidency, office of the premier and ANC tweets I couldn't help but feel hurt and thought:
1) The debate to grant Tinus Linee a state funeral or not, is surely not who this humble smiling person was and it is definitely not how his loved ones would want to remember him. He was after all a down to heart person, a people’s person.
2) Would he have wanted all the big fuss? He’s probably the only rugby player who never left his birth place to go look for better opportunities and always remained humble.
3) Whether the premier sent the request to the president or not, surely the president took note or was advised about the outcry to declare an official funeral. If he did not take note or was not advised, I would be worried.
4) Is it not within the premiers powers to declare a provincial official funeral or should this be signed off by the president.
5) Was or is someone playing politics with the issue? If so, I think it is wrong as a community is still mourning.
6) When I heard the news of the passing of Tinus, my first thought was, he deserves a Civic funeral and now I wonder why the executive mayor did not declared one. I can recall other local heroes, who were role-models for society who received a Civic funeral.
7) Why are we playing the race card on this? 20 years into democracy this should not take place.

I strongly feel it is wrong of us as South African’s to compare the funeral of Tinus Linee to that of Senzo Meyiwa (Bafana Bafana captain who was murdered).
Meyiwa was at the time the current skipper of one of our national teams and in my humble opinion, it is only right to afford him a state funeral.
Linee, was a remarkable former rugby player, with a successful career and even though I support the proposal of a provincial funeral – I also think it is unfair to compare the two.

Whether he’s afforded an official funeral or not, that will not determine his legacy that should live on.

Or as executive deputy Mayor of Drakenstein Conrad Poole said: “may the tributes result in the creation of more Tinus Linee’s.